Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Surgical experience with pancreatic and peripancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: review of 125 patients

Open access
Phan, Giao Q., Yeo, Charles J., Hruban, Ralph H., Lillemoe, Keith D., Pitt, Henry A., Cameron, John L.·1998·Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas and peripancreatic area are rare entities with a wide spectrum of clinical presentation. This study retrospectively reviews the patients who underwent surgery for these tumors at The Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1949 to 1996, inclusive There were 125 patients (65 males and 60 females) whose mean age was 51 +/- 1 years Fifty-eight patients (48%) had nonfunctional tumors, whereas 64 (52%) had functional tumors 35 (55%) insulinomas, 23 (36%) gastrmomas, three (5%) VIP-omas, two (3 %) glucagonomas, and one (1%) ACTHorna All patients with functional tumors presented with appropriate signs and symptoms of hormonal excess, 86% of patients with nonfunctional tumors presented with weight loss, abdominal pain, or jaundice Preoperaüve computed tomography (CT) correctly localized the tumor in 66 (76%) of 87 patients, angiography in 45 (58%) of 78 patients, and CT plus angiography in 54 (79%) of 68 patients Tumors were benign in 60 patients (48%), malignant m 65 patients (52%), and were located in the head, neck, or uncinate process of the pancreas in 54, body in 14, tail in 18, and duodenum in eight The most common operative procedures performed were 50 pancreaacoduodenectomies (40%), 39 distal pancreatectomies (31%), and 21 tumor enucleations (17%) Nine synchronous hepatic resections were performed for métastases Of the evaluable patients, 46 (43%) had postoperative complications, the most common of which were pancreatic fistula (16%), wound infection (15%), and delayed gastric emptying (8%) There were three in-hospital deaths (2 8%) With a mean follow-up of 55 +/-6 months, there have been 30 additional deaths, 23 of which were related to disease progression The overall 2-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial survival rates were 82%, 65%, and 47%, respectively The 5-year survival for patients with functional tumors was 77% compared to 52% for those with nonfunctional tumors (P = 0 025), the 5-year survival for patients with benign tumors was 91% compared to 49% for those with malignant tumors (P = 0 0004) By univanate analysis the most powerful predictor of poor outcome for patients with malignant tumors (n = 60) was positive surgiad margins (P = 0 006) This single-institution experience documents low mortality and moderate morbidity for patients treated operatively for pancreatic and penpancreaac neuroendocrine tumors The most favorable outcomes are observed in patients with benign functional tumors and in those with completely resected malignant tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80039-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Phan, G. Q., Yeo, C. J., Hruban, R. H., Lillemoe, K. D., Pitt, H. A., & Cameron, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
473-482
ISSN
1091-255X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015695457
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical experience with pancreatic and peripancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: review of 125 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80039-5
The paper
Phan, G. Q., Yeo, C. J., Hruban, R. H., Lillemoe, K. D., Pitt, H. A., & Cameron, J. L. (1998). Surgical experience with pancreatic and peripancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: review of 125 patients. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80039-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.