Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic factors and survival in endocrine tumor patients: comparison between gastrointestinal and pancreatic localization

Open access
Panzuto, Francesco, Nasoni, Silvia, Falconi, Massimo, Corleto, Vito Domenico, Capurso, Gabriele, Cassetta, Sara, Di Fonzo, Michela, Tornatore, Valentina, Milione, Massimo, Angeletti, Stefano, Cattaruzza, Maria Sofia, Ziparo, Vincenzo, Bordi, Cesare, Pederzoli, Paolo, Fave, Gianfranco Delle·2005·Endocrine-Related Cancer

Abstract

Since gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors are rare and heterogeneous diseases, their prognosis and long-term survival are not well known. This study aimed at identifying prognostic factors and assessing long-term survival in gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors. A total of 156 patients enrolled. Prognostic factors were determined by univariate/multivariate analysis; survival rates were assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. The tumors were non-functioning in 59.6% of patients, and originated from the pancreas in 42.9%. At diagnosis, 64.3% of patients had metastases. The tumors were well differentiated in 89.6% of patients. Ki67 was >2% in 39.6% of patients. Primary tumor size was >3 cm in 49.6% of cases studied. For the univariate analysis, the negative prognostic factors were: pancreatic origin (rate ratio 4.64, P = 0.0002), poorly differentiated tumor (rate ratio 7.70, P = 0.0001), primary tumor size >3 cm (rate ratio 4.26, P = 0.0009), presence of distant metastases (liver: rate ratio 5.88, P = 0.01; distant extra-hepatic: rate ratio 13.41, P = 0.0008). The pancreatic site, the poor degree of differentiation and the distant metastases were confirmed as negative prognostic factors at multivariate analysis. Overall 5-year survival rate was 77.5%. Survival rates differed according to: primary tumor site (62% for pancreatic vs 89.9% for gastrointestinal tract, P = 0.0001) and size (65.7% for >3 cm vs 88.8% for ≤ 3 cm, P = 0.0003), degree of differentiation (22% for poor vs 86.8% for good, P<0.0001), Ki67 (53.5% for > 2% vs 90.1% for ≤ 2%, P = 0.003), metastases (96.1, 77, 73.3 and 50.1% for absent, local, liver and distant extra-hepatic metastases respectively), age at diagnosis (85.3% for ≤ 50 years vs 70.3% for > 50 years, P = 0.03). Although 64.3% of gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors present metastases at diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate is 77.5%. Pancreatic site, a poor degree of tumor cell differentiation and distant extra-hepatic metastases are the major negative prognostic factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/erc.1.01017

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Panzuto, F., Nasoni, S., Falconi, M., Corleto, V. D., Capurso, G., Cassetta, S., Di Fonzo, M., Tornatore, V., Milione, M., Angeletti, S., Cattaruzza, M. S., Ziparo, V., Bordi, C., Pederzoli, P., & Fave, G. D.
Venue
Endocrine-Related Cancer
Published
2005-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1083-1092
ISSN
  • 1351-0088 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6821
OpenAlex
W2135926091
Cited by
391
References
21
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic factors and survival in endocrine tumor patients: comparison between gastrointestinal and pancreatic localization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1677/erc.1.01017
The paper
Panzuto, F., Nasoni, S., Falconi, M., Corleto, V. D., Capurso, G., Cassetta, S., Di Fonzo, M., Tornatore, V., Milione, M., Angeletti, S., Cattaruzza, M. S., Ziparo, V., Bordi, C., Pederzoli, P., & Fave, G. D. (2005). Prognostic factors and survival in endocrine tumor patients: comparison between gastrointestinal and pancreatic localization. Endocrine-Related Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1677/erc.1.01017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.