The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An empirical comparison of four initialization methods for the K-Means algorithm
Peña, J. M., Lozano, J. A., & Larrañaga, P. (1999) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/s0167-8655(99)00069-0 · Cited by 866
Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models
Golbraikh, A., Shen, M., Xiao, Z., Xiao, Y.-D., Lee, K.-H., & Tropsha, A. (2003) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1023/a:1025386326946 · Cited by 712
Comments on the Definition of the Q2 Parameter for QSAR Validation
Consonni, V., Ballabio, D., & Todeschini, R. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci900115y · Cited by 585
Does Rational Selection of Training and Test Sets Improve the Outcome of QSAR Modeling?
Martin, T. M., Harten, P., Young, D. M., Muratov, E. N., Golbraikh, A., Zhu, H., & Tropsha, A. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci300338w · Cited by 321
Designing with interactive example galleries
Lee, B., Srivastava, S., Kumar, R., Brafman, R., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753667 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Snarey, M., Terrett, N. K., Willett, P., & Wilton, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 372-385
- ISSN
- 1093-3263 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091589454
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1093-3263(98)00008-4
- The paper
- Snarey, M., Terrett, N. K., Willett, P., & Wilton, D. J. (1997). Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1093-3263(98)00008-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
