Cited by 143Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, HealthVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Rabbit gastrointestinal physiology

Davies, Ron Rees, Rees Davies, Jennifer A.E·2003·Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice

Abstract

The rabbit's gastrointestinal physiology is a complex system that centers around the separation of digestible and indigestible components of the diet in the proximal colon. The clinical importance of this system is the need for a consistent diet high in long particle length (> 0.5 mm) indigestible fiber to maintain the motility of the cecum and colon. Most of the common gastrointestinal problems seen in captive rabbits are related to inappropriate diets (low fiber; high protein; high carbohydrate) and infrequent feeding of treats to which the rabbit is not accustomed. Many of these problems can be avoided if captive rabbits are fed a diet consisting primarily of fibrous vegetation, such as grass, hay, and fibrous weeds. Feeding of fruits, grains, and carbohydrate or fat-based treats should be avoided. Pelleted feeds, although convenient, should be kept to a minimum, and where pellets are used those manufactured by an extrusion process, which retains the long particle length of the indigestible fiber, should be chosen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1094-9194(02)00024-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiologically, the vermiform appendix in rabbits is involved in bicarbonate secretion to buffer cecal acidity and in water secretion to form the semi fluid cecal paste.

    “Phisiologicaly, the vermiform appendix in rabbits is involved in bicarbonate secretion in order to buffer the cecal acidity and in water secretion to form the semi luid cecal paste (Davies et al., 2003;Kohles, 2014).”

    From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, R. R., & Rees Davies, J. A. E.
Corresponding author
Davies, Ron Rees
Venue
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
139-153
ISSN
1094-9194 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121641095
Cited by
143
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
cecal fermentation, colonic motility, dietary fiber, rabbit nutrition, hay, pelleted feed, extruded feed, gastrointestinal diseases
MeSH terms
Animals, Digestive System, Digestive System Physiological Phenomena, Rabbits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review