Cited by 439Physiological and biochemical adaptationsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

The use of percentages and size-specific indices to normalize physiological data for variation in body size: wasted time, wasted effort?

Packard, Gary C., Boardman, Thomas J.·1999·Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1095-6433(98)10170-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Packard, G. C., & Boardman, T. J.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Packard, Gary C.
Venue
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
37-44
ISSN
1095-6433 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042515074
Cited by
439
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 19
FWCI
15.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
body size normalization, scaling, covariance analysis, graphical method, allometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review