Cited by 20Turtle Biology and ConservationAmphibian and Reptile BiologyMarine animal studies overview

The Role of Sand Moisture in Shaping Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta Caretta) Neonate Growth in Southeast Florida

Open access
Erb, Victoria, Lolavar, Alexandra, Wyneken, Jeanette·2018·Chelonian Conservation and Biology

Abstract

Many environmental variables that affect incubating turtle eggs in the nest may also affect hatchling development, following hatchling emergence. However, these effects may be subtle and are largely unexamined. In this study, we analyzed the effect of sand moisture content during incubation on the postemergence growth rates of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in southeastern Florida. We divided 10 clutches in halves, reburied them, and exposed them to 1 of 2 treatments. At emergence, 7 clutches met minimum criteria for inclusion in the study. One halfclutch received only ambient rainfall (“dry” treatment) while the other half-clutch received ambient rainfall plus daily watering (“wet” treatment). Data loggers were used to record incubation temperatures in both groups. Hatchlings were captured at emergence and laboratoryreared over a period of ∼ 3 mo. Mass, straight carapace length (SCL), and straight carapace width (SCW) were measured weekly to track growth. Initial measurements were larger for turtles from the wet nests in all metrics. Turtles from wet nests grew more in SCW than turtles from dry nests. Turtle growth from the 2 treatments did not differ in SCL or mass measurements. Larger initial sizes and faster SCW growth may enable the turtles to more quickly achieve a refuge size from their gape-limited predators. Moisture availability during nesting season is projected to decrease based on climate change models. If that change materializes, it could negatively affect hatchling sizes and neonate growth rates, survival, and hence the recovery of this imperiled species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2744/ccb-1301.1

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R. Herlands, R.C. Wood, J. Pritchard, et al. "Conservation and Ecology of Turtles of the Mid-Atlantic Region: A Symposium." , "Diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) head-starting project in southern New Jersey." 13 (2004)
  2. J.D. Miller and C.J. Limpus "Proceedings of the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium." , "Incubation period and sexual differentiation in the green turtle Chelonia mydasL." 66 (1981)

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Erb, V., Lolavar, A., & Wyneken, J.
Affiliations
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Corresponding author
Erb, Victoria
Venue
Chelonian Conservation and Biology
Published
2018-12-18
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
245
ISSN
1071-8443 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914225040
Cited by
20
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Chelonian Conservation and Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
Caretta caretta, sand moisture, hatchling growth, incubation temperature, carapace width, carapace length, body mass, climate change, Southeast Florida

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review