Cited by 107Estrogen and related hormone effectsReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNuclear Receptors and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Allosteric Control of Ligand Selectivity between Estrogen Receptors α and β

Open access

Abstract

Allosteric communication between interacting molecules is fundamental to signal transduction and many other cellular processes. To better understand the relationship between nuclear receptor (NR) ligand positioning and the formation of the coactivator binding pocket, we investigated the determinants of ligand selectivity between the two estrogen receptor subtypes ERalpha and ERbeta. Chimeric receptors and structurally guided amino acid substitutions were used to demonstrate that distinct "hot spot" amino acids are required for ligand selectivity. Residues within the ligand binding pocket as well as distal secondary structural interactions contribute to subtype-specific positioning of the ligand and transcriptional output. Examination of other NRs suggests a mechanism of communication between the ligand and coactivator binding pockets, accounting for partial agonist and dimer-specific activity. These results demonstrate the importance of long-range interactions in the transmission of information through the ligand binding domain as well as in determining the ligand selectivity of closely related NR receptor subtypes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00054-1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nettles, K. W., Sun, J., Radek, J. T., Sheng, S., Rodriguez, A. L., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Katzenellenbogen, B. S., & Greene, G. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Greene, Geoffrey L.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
317-327
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052459433
Cited by
99
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA089489, 5R01 CA 18119, R01 CA89489, P30 CA14599-29, CA25836, R01CA018119, P30CA014599)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R37DK015556, 5R37DK-15556)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta, ligand selectivity, allosteric communication, nuclear receptors, ligand-binding domain, chimeric receptors, amino acid substitutions, long-range interactions, partial agonism, transcriptional output
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Nucleus, Humans, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Receptors, Estrogen, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, COS Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Estrogen Receptor beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review