Cited by 789Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Are microorganisms more effective than plants at competing for nitrogen?

Hodge, Angela, Robinson, David, Fitter, Alastair·2000·Trends in Plant Science

Abstract

Plant scientists have long debated whether plants or microorganisms are the superior competitor for nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Microorganisms have traditionally been viewed as the victors but recent evidence that plants can take up organic nitrogen compounds intact and can successfully acquire N from organic patches in soil raises the question anew. We argue that the key determinants of 'success' in nitrogen competition are spatial differences in nitrogen availability and in root and microbial distributions, together with temporal differences in microbial and root turnover. Consequently, it is not possible to discuss plant-microorganism competition without taking into account this spatiotemporal context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01656-3

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodge, A., Robinson, D., & Fitter, A.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Hodge, Angela
Venue
Trends in Plant Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
304-308
ISSN
1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004942186
Cited by
789
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Plant Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
nitrogen competition, plant-microbe competition, organic nitrogen uptake, soil nitrogen, root distribution, microbial distribution, spatiotemporal variation, root turnover, microbial turnover
MeSH terms
Fungi, Nitrogen, Nitrogen Fixation, Plants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review