The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style
Abstract
Recently, there has been a convergence in lesion and neuroimaging data in the identification of circuits underlying positive and negative emotion in the human brain. Emphasis is placed on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the amygdala as two key components of this circuitry. Emotion guides action and organizes behavior towards salient goals. To accomplish this, it is essential that the organism have a means of representing affect in the absence of immediate elicitors. It is proposed that the PFC plays a crucial role in affective working memory. The ventromedial sector of the PFC is most directly involved in the representation of elementary positive and negative emotional states while the dorsolateral PFC may be involved in the representation of the goal states towards which these elementary positive and negative states are directed. The amygdala has been consistently identified as playing a crucial role in both the perception of emotional cues and the production of emotional responses, with some evidence suggesting that it is particularly involved with fear-related negative affect. Individual differences in amygdala activation are implicated in dispositional affective styles and increased reactivity to negative incentives. The ventral striatum, anterior cingulate and insular cortex also provide unique contributions to emotional processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Frontal EEG asymmetry is one of the neural indicators of emotion regulation motivations.
“Frontal EEG asymmetry is one of the neural indicators of emotion regulation motivations (Coan & Allen, 2004;Davidson & Irwin, 1999;Harmon-Jones, 2003;Reznik & Allen, 2018).”
From Frontal Electroencephalography Asymmetry and Desynchronized Functional Connectivity Associated with Long-Term and Short-Term Breathing Training (2026) · cites this paper as Davidson & Irwin, 1999
The right frontal region is closely linked to withdrawal motivation, inhibition, and negative emotions (e.g., fear, anxiety, and disgust).
“In contrast, the right frontal region was closely linked to withdrawal motivation, inhibition, and negative emotions (e.g., fear, anxiety, and disgust) (Coan & Allen, 2004;Davidson & Irwin, 1999;Reznik & Allen, 2018).”
From Frontal Electroencephalography Asymmetry and Desynchronized Functional Connectivity Associated with Long-Term and Short-Term Breathing Training (2026) · cites this paper as Davidson & Irwin, 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 102 · Cited by 1,684
- Authors
- Davidson, R. J., & Irwin, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davidson, Richard J.
- ORCID
- Davidson, Richard J.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-21
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133105630
- Cited by
- 1,684
- References
- 102
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 91
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- emotions, affective style, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, positive and negative emotions, fear, emotional processing, individual differences, emotional reactivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review