Cited by 243Biofuel production and bioconversionEnzyme Production and CharacterizationLignin and Wood Chemistry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioconversion of lignocellulose in solid substrate fermentation

Tengerdy, R.P., Szakacs, G.·2003·Biochemical Engineering Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1369-703x(02)00129-8

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Balakrishnan, 1996, Production of biologically active secondary metabolites in solid state fermentation, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 55, 365
  2. R.G. Burns, Carbon mineralization by mixed cultures, in: A.T. Bolt, J.H. Slater (Eds.), Microbial Interactions and Communities, vol. 1, Academic Press, London, 1982, pp. 475–563.
  3. M.R. Castillo, G. Szakacs, R.P. Tengerdy, Solid substrate fermentation on extracted sweet sorghum silage, in: P. Chartier, A. Beenackers, G. Grassi (Eds.), Biomass for Energy, Environment, Agriculture and Industry, vol. 2, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1995, pp. 1460–1464.
  4. M. Claeyssens, W. Nerinckx, K. Piens (Eds.), Carbohydrases from Trichoderma reesei and other microorganisms, in: Structures, Biochemistry, Genetics and Applications, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
  5. H.W. Doelle, D.A. Mitchell, C.E. Rolz (Eds.), Solid State Cultivation, Elsevier, New York, 1992.
  6. D.H. Griffin, Fungal Physiology, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1994.
  7. Gutierrez-Correa, 1999, Cellulolytic enzyme production by fungal mixed culture solid substrate fermentation, Agro-Food-Ind. Hi-Technol., 10, 6
  8. B.K. Lonsane, N.P. Ghildyal, Exoenzymes, in: H.W. Doelle, D.A. Mitchell, C.E. Roltz (Eds.), Solid State Cultivation, Elsevier, New York, 1993, Chapter 11, pp. 191–210.
  9. M. Miller, L.L. Henk, M.N. Karim, J.C. Linden, Control of solid state fermentation production of cellulases, in: Abstracts from the 21st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Fort Collins, CO, May 5, 1999, pp. 3–02.
  10. M. Moo Young, A.R. Moreira, R.P. Tengerdy, Principles of solid substrate fermentation, in: J.E. Smith, D.R. Berry, B. Kristiansen (Eds.), Fungal Technology, Filamentous Fungi, vol. 4, Arnold, London, 1983, pp. 117–144.
  11. Nigam, 1996, Processing of agricultural wastes in solid state fermentation for cellulolytic enzyme production, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 55, 457
  12. S.K. Picataggio, M. Zhang, C.K. Eddy, K.A. Deanda, M. Finkelstein, US Patent 5,514,583 (1996).
  13. J.R. Pluske, M.D. Lindemann, Enzyme supplementation of pig and poultry diets, in: T.P. Lyons, K.A. Jacques (Eds.), Proceedings of the Alltech’s 14th Annual Symposium, Passport to the Year 2000, Biotechnology in the Feed Industry, Nottingham University Press, UK, 1998, pp. 375–392.
  14. J. Postma (Ed.), Methods to monitor microbial inoculants to improve their success, in: Book of Abstracts of COST 830 Workshop, April 6–8, 2000, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  15. M.F. Ruth, J.A. Howard, Z. Nikolov, B.S. Hooker, M.E. Himmel, S.R. Thomas, Preliminary economic analysis of agricultural production for use in cellulose hydrolysis, in: Abstracts from the 21st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Fort Collins, CO, May 5, 1999, Poster 3/49.
  16. I. Salmon, A.T. Bull, Mixed culture fermentation in industrial microbiology, in: M.D. Klug, C.A. Reddy (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology, Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC, 1984, pp. 656–662.
  17. Sary, 1988, Microbial starter cultures for improving soil fertility, Biotechnol. Environ. Protect. Hungary, 2, 44
  18. L. Sary, R.P. Tengerdy, S. Der, L. Kusz, Directed composting using Trichoderma harzianum strains, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Applied Microbiology, Prague, Czech Republic, July 3–8, 1994 (poster).
  19. Scott, 1998, New technology for papermaking: commercializing biopulping, TAPPI J., 81, 220
  20. S. Suryanarayan, New frontiers in solid-state fermentation, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Horizons in Biotechnology, Trivandrum, India, April 18–21, 2001 (oral presentation).
  21. G. Szakacs, K. Urbanszki, G. Lepenye, R.P. Tengerdy, Cellulase and xylanase produced by solid substrate fermentation for biobleaching and ensiling, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Biotechnology in the Pulp and Paper Industry, Abstract Book, vol. C, Vancouver, Canada, June 16–19, 1998, pp. C111–C112 (poster presentations).
  22. G. Szakacs, R.P. Tengerdy, Production of substrate specific enzyme complexes by solid substrate fermentation for hydrolysis of cellulose- and hemicellulose-containing materials, in: Proceedings of the Conference Pacifichem 2000, Honolulu, HI, December 14–19, 2000 (oral presentation).
  23. G. Szakacs, B. Bogar, J. Szendefy, L. Christov, R.P. Tengerdy, Production of alpha-amylase and xylanase by solid substrate fermentation, in: Proceedings of the Conference Pacifichem 2000, Honolulu, HI, December 14–19, 2000 (oral presentation).
  24. G. Szakacs, B. Bogar, T. Molnar, E. Szilagyi, J. Fekete, R.P. Tengerdy, Optimization of alpha-amylase and lovastatin production in solid substrate fermentation, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Horizons in Biotechnology, Trivandrum, India, April 18–21, 2001 (oral presentation).
  25. R.P. Tengerdy, Solid state fermentation of lignocellulose, in: H.W. Doelle, D.A. Mitchell, C.E. Rolz (Eds.), Solid State Cultivation, Elsevier, New York, 1992, Chapter 14.
  26. Tengerdy, 1996, Cellulase production by solid substrate fermentation, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 55, 313
  27. Tsao, 2000, Solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger for cellobiase production, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 84/86, 743, 10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:743 · DOI
  28. Wright, 1998, Evaluation of bioethanol production from lignocellulose, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 57/58, 741

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Tengerdy, R. P., & Szakacs, G.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
Corresponding author
Tengerdy, R.P.
Venue
Biochemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
13
Issue
2-3
Pages
169-179
ISSN
1369-703X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153864275
Cited by
243
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biochemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
Keywords
lignocellulose conversion, solid-state fermentation, lignocellulolytic fungi, online process control, biofuels, enzymes, animal feed, biofertilizers, biopesticides, secondary metabolites, paper industry, integrated crop management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review