CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nanofiltration of textile plant effluent for color removal and reduction in COD

Chakraborty, S., Purkait, M.K., DasGupta, S., De, S., Basu, J.K.·2003·Separation and Purification Technology
DOI 10.1016/s1383-5866(02)00177-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1383-5866(02)00177-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concentrated sludge production and frequent membrane fouling requiring costly membrane replacement impede widespread use of membrane technology.

    “However, concentrated sludge production and occurrence of frequent membrane fouling requiring costly membrane replacement impede widespread use of this technology 36 .”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [36]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Gupta, 2000, Removal of basic dyes (Rhodamine B and Methylene blue) from aqueous solutions using bagasse fly ash, Sep. Sci. Technol., 35, 2097, 10.1081/SS-100102091 · DOI
  2. Marcucci, 2001, Treatment and reuse of textile effluents based on new ultrafiltration and other membrane technologies, Desalination, 138, 75, 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00247-8 · DOI
  3. Treffry-Goatley, 1983, Reverse osmosis treatment and reuse of textile dyehouse effluents, Desalination, 47, 313, 10.1016/0011-9164(83)87086-6 · DOI
  4. Brandon, 1981, Closed cycle textile dyeing: full scale renovation of hot wash water by hyperfiltration, Desalination, 39, 301, 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)86135-4 · DOI
  5. Porter, 1984, Recovery of hotwater, dyes, and auxiliary chemicals from textile wastewaters, Desalination, 49, 185, 10.1016/0011-9164(84)85030-4 · DOI
  6. Buckley, 1985, Pretreatment, fouling and cleaning in the membrane processing of industrial effluents, ACS. Symp. Ser., 261
  7. El-Nasher, 1980, Energy and water conservation through recycle of dyeing wastewater using dynamic Zr (iv)—PAA membranes, Desalination, 33, 21, 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)88560-4 · DOI
  8. Nowak, 1986, Decolorization of dye solutions and textile effluents, Desalination, 60, 59, 10.1016/0011-9164(86)80005-4 · DOI
  9. Nowak, 1989, Effect of flow conditions on ultrafiltration efficiency of dye solutions and textile effluents, Desalination, 71, 127, 10.1016/0011-9164(89)80004-9 · DOI
  10. Yazhen, 1999, Treatment of textile dye plant effluent by nanofiltration membrane, Sep. Sci. Technol., 34, 2501, 10.1081/SS-100100787 · DOI
  11. Schrig, 1992, Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for the separation of aqueous dye-salt solutions, Desalination, 89, 89, 10.1016/0011-9164(92)80154-2 · DOI
  12. Yu, 2001, Nanofiltration used for desalination and concentration in dye production, Desalination, 140, 97, 10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00358-7 · DOI
  13. Dhale, 2000, Studies on treatment of disperse dye waste: membrane-wet oxidation process, Waste Manage., 20, 85, 10.1016/S0956-053X(99)00276-7 · DOI
  14. Van der Bruggen, 2001, Water reclamation in the textile industry: nanofiltration of dye baths for wool dyeing;, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, 3973, 10.1021/ie010104y · DOI · Paper page
  15. Satyanarayana, 2000, Flux decline during ultrafiltration of kraft black liquor using different flow modules: a comparative study, Sep. Puri. Technol., 20, 155, 10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00086-1 · DOI
  16. Van der Bruggen, 2001, Flux decline during nanofiltration of organic components in aqueous solution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 3535, 10.1021/es0100064 · DOI
  17. Vogel, 1970, Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 385, 818

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chakraborty, S., Purkait, M. K., DasGupta, S., De, S., & Basu, J. K.
Venue
Separation and Purification Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
141-151
ISSN
1383-5866
DOI
10.1016/s1383-5866(02)00177-6
Cited by
260
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review