Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test

Datar, Vinay T., Y. Naik, Narayan, Radcliffe, Robert·1998·Journal of Financial Markets

DOI 10.1016/s1386-4181(97)00004-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1386-4181(97)00004-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

… and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns
Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y., & Zhu, H. (2016) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv059 · Cited by 2,119
Socially responsible funds and market crises
Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016 · Cited by 648
Dissecting Characteristics Nonparametrically
Freyberger, J., Neuhierl, A., & Weber, M. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz123 · Cited by 619
The supraview of return predictive signals
Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Zhang, X. F. (2013) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-013-9231-1 · Cited by 219
Non-Standard Errors in Portfolio Sorts
Walter, D., Weber, R., & Weiss, P. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4164117 · Cited by 12

Authors: Datar, V. T., Y. Naik, N., & Radcliffe, R.
Venue: Journal of Financial Markets
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1998-08
Volume: 1
Issue: 2
Pages: 203-219
ISSN: 1386-4181 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-4181(97)00004-9
OpenAlex: W2047485150
Cited by: 1,312
References: 0
FWCI: 22.91
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review