Cited by 220Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesStock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance

The supraview of return predictive signals

Open access
Green, Jeremiah, Hand, John R. M., Zhang, X. Frank·2013·Review of Accounting Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11142-013-9231-1

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both stock and aggregate return predictions, there presumably exists a much larger set of predictors that were tested but failed to predict returns and were thus never reported.

    “In both stock and aggregate return predictions, there presumably exists a much larger set of predictors that were tested but failed to predict returns and were thus never reported.”

    From Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Green et al. (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, J., Hand, J. R. M., & Zhang, X. F.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
  • Green, Jeremiah
  • Hand, John R. M.
Venue
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2013-06-06
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
692-730
ISSN
  • 1380-6653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7136
OpenAlex
W3123267500
Cited by
219
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
15.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Accounting Studies (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
City, University of London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Keywords
stock returns, Sharpe ratio, orthogonalization, stock market efficiency, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review