Cited by 39Electronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationMedical Coding and Health Information

CareWeb™, a web-based medical record for an integrated health care delivery system

Halamka, John D., Osterland, Carsten, Safran, Charles·1999·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

With the advent of Integrated Health care Delivery Systems, medical records are increasingly distributed across multiple institutions. Timely access to these medical records is a critical need for health care providers. The CareWeb project provides an architecture for World Wide Web-based retrieval of electronic medical records from heterogeneous data sources. Using Health Level 7 (HL7), web technologies and readily available software components, we consolidated the electronic records of Boston's Beth Israel and Deaconess Hospitals. We report on the creation of CareWeb (freya.bidmc.harvard.edu/careweb.htm) and propose it as a means to electronically link Integrated Health care Delivery Systems and geographically distant information resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00095-1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the pilot project phase from September 2017 through March 2018, clinicians at the intervention ED site used HIE significantly more (10.55%) than at other EDs (3.2%) during the study period (p < 0.001).

    “The study found that clinicians at the intervention ED site used HIE significantly more (10.55%) than at other EDs (3.2%) during the study period (p < 0.001) [ [30, 32]].”
  • Community HIEs typically do not integrate work and data flows directly with EHRs in health care practices and other organizations, resulting in workflow inefficiencies, increased information retrieval effort, and cognitive friction.

    “Community HIEs typically do not integrate work and data flows directly with electronic health records (EHRs) in health care practices and other organizations. This lack of integration forces clinicians to access HIE data using a system separate from their EHR, resulting in workflow inefficiencies, increased information retrieval effort, and cognitive friction [30].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halamka, J. D., Osterland, C., & Safran, C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Halamka, John D.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994084302
Cited by
39
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (U01-08749)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, integrated health system, Health Level 7, heterogeneous data sources, hospital information system integration, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
MeSH terms
Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Computer Security, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review