The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · Cited by 2,706
Edgington, E., Edgington, E., & Onghena, P. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420011814 · Cited by 2,030
Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man
Knight, R. T. (1984) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(84)90016-9 · Cited by 828
Cited by
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 · Cited by 2,644
The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00019-7 · Cited by 1,282
Talsma, D., Doty, T. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhk016 · Cited by 434
Sokka, L., Leinikka, M., Korpela, J., Henelius, A., Ahonen, L., Alain, C., Alho, K., & Huotilainen, M. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.02.010 · Cited by 46
Sabri, M., Labelle, S., Gosselin, A., & Campbell, K. B. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00090-9 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Schröger, E., Giard, M.-H., & Wolff, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1450-1460
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067284713
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
