Cited by 58Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsPeripheral Nerve Disorders

Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis

Rösler, Kai M., Petrow, Elisabeth, Mathis, Johannes, Arányi, Zsuzsanna, Hess, Christian W., Magistris, Michel R.·2002·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses.Methods MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies.Results MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients.Conclusions The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00263-8

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MEPs were excluded when pre-TMS EMG activity was identified, with visual inspection blind to condition, which occurred in 2.7% of trials.

    “Since even very small muscle contractions increase MEP size (Rösler et al., 2002), MEPs were excluded when activity was identified in the 100ms prior to TMS stimulation upon visual inspection while blind to condition (only 2.7% of trials).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rösler, K. M., Petrow, E., Mathis, J., Arányi, Z., Hess, C. W., & Magistris, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Rösler, Kai M.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
1680-1687
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057878655
Cited by
58
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Keywords
motor evoked potentials, triple stimulation technique, transcranial magnetic stimulation, multiple sclerosis, stimulus intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Cortical Synchronization, Electromagnetic Fields, Electromyography, Electrophysiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Neural Conduction, Muscle, Skeletal, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review