Effect of discharge desynchronization on the size of motor evoked potentials: an analysis
Abstract
Objective Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation (TMS) are smaller than CMAPs after peripheral nerve stimulation, because desynchronization of the TMS-induced motor neurone discharges occurs (i.e. MEP desynchronization). This desynchronization effect can be eliminated by use of the triple stimulation technique (TST; Brain 121 (1998) 437). The objective of this paper is to study the effect of discharge desynchronization on MEPs by comparing the size of MEP and TST responses.Methods MEP and TST responses were obtained in 10 healthy subjects during isometric contractions of the abductor digiti minimi, during voluntary background contractions between 0% and 20% of maximal force, and using 3 different stimulus intensities. Additional data from other normals and from multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were obtained from previous studies.Results MEPs were smaller than TST responses in all subjects and under all stimulating conditions, confirming the marked influence of desynchronization on MEPs. There was a linear relation between the amplitudes of MEPs vs. TST responses, independent of the degree of voluntary contraction and stimulus intensity. The slope of the regression equation was 0.66 on average, indicating that desynchronization reduced the MEP amplitude on average by one third, with marked inter-individual variations. A similar average proportion was found in MS patients.Conclusions The MEP size reduction induced by desynchronization is not influenced by the intensity of TMS and by the level of facilitatory voluntary background contractions. It is similar in healthy subjects and in MS patients, in whom increased desynchronization of central conduction was previously suggested to occur. Thus, the MEP size reduction observed may not parallel the actual amount of desynchronization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MEPs were excluded when pre-TMS EMG activity was identified, with visual inspection blind to condition, which occurred in 2.7% of trials.
“Since even very small muscle contractions increase MEP size (Rösler et al., 2002), MEPs were excluded when activity was identified in the 100ms prior to TMS stimulation upon visual inspection while blind to condition (only 2.7% of trials).”
From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Rösler et al., 2002
Cites
Hess, C. W., Mills, K. R., & Murray, N. M. F. (1986) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(86)90565-3 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Self-citationMagistris, M. R. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.3.437 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Self-citationA clinical study of motor evoked potentials using a triple stimulation technique
Magistris, M. R., Rösler, K. M., Truffert, A., Landis, T., & Hess, C. W. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.2.265 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationRelation between size of compound sensory or muscle action potentials, and length of nerve segment
Kimura, J., Machida, M., Ishida, T., et al. (1986) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.36.5.647 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Boniface, S. J., Mills, K. R., & Schubert, M. (1991) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/114.1.643 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Quantification of upper motor neuron loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Rösler, K. M., Truffert, A., Hess, C. W., & Magistris, M. R. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00481-8 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationThe triple stimulation technique to study central motor conduction to the lower limbs
Bühler, R., Magistris, M. R., Truffert, A., et al. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00506-5 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationRapid cortical motor output map changes assessed by the triple stimulation technique
Rösler, K. M., Etter, C., Truffert, A., et al. (1999) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199902250-00025 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurophysiologic evaluation of lower motor neuron damage in tetraplegia
Gorman, P. H., Kikta, D. G., & Peckham, P. H. (1998) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199810)21:10 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Placebo-Induced Changes in Excitatory and Inhibitory Corticospinal Circuits during Motor Performance
Fiorio, M., Emadi Andani, M., Marotta, A., Classen, J., & Tinazzi, M. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3931-13.2014 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance
Cross, K. A., & Iacoboni, M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.027 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Since even very smallmuscle contractions increaseMEP size (Rösler et al., 2002),MEPswere excludedwhen activity was identified in the 100 ms prior to TMS stimulation upon visual inspection while blinded to condition (only 2.7% of trials).”
Influential
- Authors
- Rösler, K. M., Petrow, E., Mathis, J., Arányi, Z., Hess, C. W., & Magistris, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Rösler, Kai M.
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1680-1687
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057878655
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
- Keywords
- motor evoked potentials, triple stimulation technique, transcranial magnetic stimulation, multiple sclerosis, stimulus intensity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cortical Synchronization, Electromagnetic Fields, Electromyography, Electrophysiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Neural Conduction, Muscle, Skeletal, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review