Cited by 195Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Compliance and Effectiveness of 1 Year's Home Telemonitoring. The Report of a Pilot Study of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Open access
de Lusignan, Simon, Wells, Sally, Johnson, Paul, Meredith, Karen, Leatham, Edward·2001·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, registered at the study practice, were recruited into the study. First, they had a cardiologist's assessment. They were then randomised into telemonitored patients who measured pulse, BP, weight and video consulted, and controls. Aim: To examine the acceptability, effectiveness and reliability of home telemonitoring. Results: A high proportion of those invited took part (n-20/24). Compliance with measuring weight, pulse and BP remained high throughout the study. The data collection system and secure web-server were reliable. The telemonitoring group complied better with collecting prescriptions for their cardiac drugs. Video consulting started with enthusiasm, but became less useful. There were no significant differences in the quality of life (GHQ) and Chronic Heart Failure (Guyatt) questionnaire scores between the telemonitored group and the controls. Conclusions: Home telemonitoring is an acceptable reliable intervention. Baseline rates for compliance with self-monitoring are set out in this study. Benefit in terms of compliance with medication and self-monitoring is still seen after 1 year. Video consulting over ordinary telephone lines did not show sustained benefit, and was not complied with.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1388-9842(01)00190-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 195

Authors
de Lusignan, S., Wells, S., Johnson, P., Meredith, K., & Leatham, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Hunter Wing, St George's Hospital Medical School , London, SW17 0RE ,
  • Woodbridge Hill Surgery , Guildford ,
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Surrey and Hampshire Borders NHS Trust Woodbridge Hill Surgery , Guildford ,
  • Royal Surrey County Hospital (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
723-730
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2004864869
Cited by
195
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
MSD K.K.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
home health monitoring, chronic heart failure, blood pressure measurement, pulse measurement, weight measurement, video consultation, medication adherence, quality of life, remote patient monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Chronic Disease, Equipment Failure, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Heart Failure, Home Nursing, Humans, Medical Records, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Pulse, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Time Factors, Cardiology Service, Hospital, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review