The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing
Schmitt, M. W., Kennedy, S. R., Salk, J. J., Fox, E. J., Hiatt, J. B., & Loeb, L. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1208715109 · Cited by 1,047
Srinivasan, S., Hoffman, N. G., Morgan, M. T., Matsen, F. A., Fiedler, T. L., Hall, R. W., Ross, F. J., McCoy, C. O., Bumgarner, R., Marrazzo, J. M., et al. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037818 · Cited by 673
The Madness of Microbiome: Attempting To Find Consensus “Best Practice” for 16S Microbiome Studies
Pollock, J., Glendinning, L., Wisedchanwet, T., & Watson, M. (2018) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02627-17 · Cited by 575
The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies
Vaginal Microbiome Consortium (additional members), Brooks, J. P., Edwards, D. J., Harwich, M. D., Rivera, M. C., Fettweis, J. M., Serrano, M. G., Reris, R. A., Sheth, N. U., Huang, B., et al. (2015) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0351-6 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanagawa, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-323
- ISSN
- 1347-4421 (ISSN-L)
- 1389-1723
- OpenAlex
- W2088170018
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1389-1723(03)90130-7
- The paper
- Kanagawa, T. (2003). Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reactions (PCR). Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-1723(03)90130-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
