CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 259Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Education and Training Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The validity of a repeated sprint ability test

Bishop, David, Spencer, Matt, Duffield, Rob, Lawrence, Steve·2001·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
DOI 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80004-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Many team sports require participants to repeatedly produce maximal or near maximal sprints of short duration (1-7s) with brief recovery periods, over an extended period of time (60-90 min). Therefore, an important fitness component for these sports is what is often termed repeated sprint ability (RSA). A variety of tests have been devised to assess RSA. However, while the reliability of some of these tests has been reported, there has been no published attempt to assess the validity of RSA tests. The purpose of the present paper was to assess the validity of a popular RSA test--the 5 x 6 s cycle test. Ten moderately-trained males (Mean+/-SD age: 23.6+/-3.0 yrs, mass: 71.8+/-7.4 kg, peak VO2: 46.32+/-4.16 ml.kg(-1)min(-1)) participated in the investigation. Following familiarisation, subjects reported to the laboratory at the same time of day, on three occasions, each separated by at least 48 hours. Testing consisted of a 5 x 6 s cycle test (5 x 6 s maximal sprints every 30 s), a graded exercise test (GXT) and a simulated game (3 x 15 min periods separated by five min). The simulated game consisted of a 1-min circuit that was repeated 15 times in each period. The circuit replicated typical movement patterns observed during motion analysis of field hockey games. Each circuit commenced with a 15-m maximum sprint through timing gates. Time to run 5, 10 and 15 m was recorded. Oxygen consumption was measured during both the GXT and the simulated game with a portable gas analysis system (Cosmed K4 b2, Italy). Correlation coefficients between dependent variables were calculated using Pearson's Product Moment (r). There was a significant correlation between power decrement during the 5 x 6 s cycle test and decrement in 15-m time across the three periods (r = 0.76, P<0.05), but not decrement in 10-m time (r = 0.54) or 5-m time (r = 0.42). These results suggest that the 5 x 6 s cycle test is valid for assessing the decrement in 15-m time, but not the decrement in 5 or 10m time. Thus, one measure of RSA (sprint decrement) appears to be specific to the test protocol, rather than a general quality. The most likely explanation is that the energy requirements of the 5 x 6 s cycle test more closely match those required to repeatedly run 15 m (mean time = 2.74 s) than to repeatedly run 10 m (mean time = 1.97 s) or 5 m (mean time = 1.13 s). It is therefore suggested that, while the 5 x 6 s cycle test is often used to assess RSA ability in a wide range of sports, it may need to be modified to reflect the common sprint distances found in specific sports.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80004-9

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dawson, 1993, The relationship of repeated sprint ability to aerobic power and performance measures of anaerobic work capacity and power, The Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 25, 88
  2. Fitzsimons, 1993, Cycling and running tests of repeated sprint ability, The Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 25, 82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 258

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bishop, D., Spencer, M., Duffield, R., & Lawrence, S.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
19-29
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80004-9
OpenAlex
W2062268700
Cited by
259
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
repeated sprint ability, test validity, test reliability, simulation games, field hockey, energy requirements, oxygen consumption, test specificity, incremental exercise test
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Sports

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review