The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a psychometrically valid and reliable sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The SNKQ has undergone assessment for validity (content and construct) and reliability (test–retest), demonstrating high construct validity and good test–retest concordance, thus confirming its suitability for determining sports nutrition knowledge.”
In the citing paper
“Data were collected using a structured interview questionnaire adapted from previously validated work and published literature [20,21].”
From Patterns of Nutrition and Dietary Supplements Use in Young Egyptian Athletes: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey (2016) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Similarly, two studies(26,30) that used questionnaires based on Zinn et al. (59) reported poor scores.”
From Adolescent athletes have better general than sports nutrition knowledge and lack awareness of supplement recommendations: a systematic literature review (2024) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“Zinn et al.(59) created and validated an eighty-four-item SNK questionnaire covering the following subtopics: nutrients, dietary reference intake, recovery, weight gain, weight loss and supplements.”
From Adolescent athletes have better general than sports nutrition knowledge and lack awareness of supplement recommendations: a systematic literature review (2024) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a general nutrition knowledge Questionnaire for adults
Parmenter, K., & Wardle, J. (1999) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600726 · Cited by 633
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Axelson, 1992, The measurement and conceptualization of nutrition knowledge, J Nutr Educ., 24, 239, 10.1016/S0022-3182(12)81238-6 · DOI
- Smith Rockwell, 2001, Nutrition knowledge, opinions, and practices of coaches and athletic trainers at a division 1 university, Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab., 11, 174, 10.1123/ijsnem.11.2.174 · DOI · Paper page
- Bedgood, 1983, Nutrition knowledge of high school athletic coaches in Texas, J Am Diet Assoc., 83, 672, 10.1016/S0002-8223(21)07882-2 · DOI
Cited by
Logue, D. M., Madigan, S. M., Melin, A., Delahunt, E., Heinen, M., Donnell, S.-J. M., & Corish, C. A. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12030835 · Cited by 321
Condo, D., Lohman, R., Kelly, M., & Carr, A. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11050971 · Cited by 122
Tawfik, S., El Koofy, N., & Moawad, E. M. I. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161252 · Cited by 63
Tektunalı Akman, C., Gönen Aydın, C., & Ersoy, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1289448 · Cited by 46
Hulland, S. C., Trakman, G. L., & Alcock, R. D. (2024) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114523002799 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Zinn, C., Schofield, G., & Wall, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-351
- ISSN
- 1440-2440
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
