Development of a physical function outcome measure (PFIT) and a pilot exercise training protocol for use in intensive care
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an outcome measure as a basis for prescribing and evaluating rehabilitation in the critically ill, and to measure its reliability and responsiveness to change. The study also aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of a pilot exercise training protocol in an intensive care unit. METHODS: We developed a battery of tests (the Physical Function ICU Test [PFIT]) to measure endurance, strength, cardiovascular capacity and functional level. Patients with a tracheostomy who were mechanically ventilated were recruited from a medical-surgical ICU and respiratory weaning unit at a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Victoria, between 2003 and 2005. Patients underwent a pilot exercise training protocol and performed the PFIT when able to stand, and again after weaning from ventilation. RESULTS: The PFIT demonstrated good reliability and was responsive to change. Twelve patients completed testing and exercise sessions with no adverse events; 50 of 63 possible training sessions (79%) were delivered. Participants increased the marching on the spot result by a mean difference of 86.3 steps and 56 s (P < 0.05), and the shoulder flexion result by 8 repetitions (P < 0.05). Improvement in function and muscle strength was also observed (P < 0.05). Inter-rater reliability for the PFIT was good (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.996-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The PFIT is a reliable and responsive outcome measure, and the pilot training protocol was safe and feasible. As exercise may attenuate weakness and functional impairment, the PFIT can be used to prescribe and evaluate exercise and mobilisation. Future research should aim to develop a PFIT score and investigate the ability of the PFIT to predict ICU readmission risk and functional outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A small number of trials have shown that modest physical activity is possible in people with chronic illnesses or those recovering from critical illness.
“Thus, a small number of trials have shown that modest physical activity is possible in people with chronic illnesses or those recovering from critical illness, 169e171 but more and larger trials are needed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such strategies, especially because protein supplementation alone may not be sufficient to rescue very old people or those with severe muscle loss.160”
From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [171]
Cites
The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons
Podsiadlo, D., & Richardson, S. (1991) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x · Cited by 14,418 · see citing works
One-Year Outcomes in Survivors of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Herridge, M. S., Cheung, A. M., Tansey, C. M., Matte-Martyn, A., Diaz-Granados, N., Al-Saidi, F., Cooper, A. B., Guest, C. B., Mazer, C. D., Mehta, S., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022450 · Cited by 2,334 · see citing works
An overview of the issues: physiological effects of bed rest and restricted physical activity
CONVERTINO, V. A., BLOOMFIELD, S. A., & GREENLEAF, J. E. (1997) · Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199702000-00004 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Morley, J. E., Phillips, S., Sieber, C., Stehle, P., Teta, D., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021 · Cited by 2,553 · see citing works
Connolly, B., Denehy, L., Brett, S., Elliott, D., & Hart, N. (2012) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc11219 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationKayambu, G., Boots, R. J., & Paratz, J. D. (2011) · BMC Anesthesiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2253-11-21 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Skinner, E. H., Berney, S., Warrillow, S., & Denehy, L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Austin Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Skinner, Elizabeth H
- Venue
- Critical Care and Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-115
- ISSN
- 1441-2772 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2182187828
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Critical Care and Resuscitation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- outcome measure development, exercise training protocols, intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, respiratory weaning, inter-rater reliability, responsiveness to change, muscle strength, endurance, cardiovascular capacity, mobilization
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Critical Care, Exercise Test, Feasibility Studies, Female, Heart, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Endurance, Pilot Projects, Tracheostomy, Reproducibility of Results, Ventilator Weaning, Critical Illness, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle Strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review