Cited by 49Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersMedical Practices and RehabilitationClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Exercise rehabilitation following hospital discharge in survivors of critical illness: an integrative review

Open access
Connolly, Bronwen, Denehy, Linda, Brett, Stephen, Elliott, Doug, Hart, Nicholas·2012·Critical Care

Abstract

Although clinical trials have shown benefit from early rehabilitation within the ICU, rehabilitation of patients following critical illness is increasingly acknowledged as an area of clinical importance. However, despite recommendations from published guidelines for rehabilitation to continue following hospital discharge, there is limited evidence to underpin practice during this intermediate stage of recovery. Those patients with ICU-acquired weakness on discharge from the ICU are most likely to benefit from ongoing rehabilitation. Despite this, screening based on strength alone may fail to account for the associated level of physical functioning, which may not correlate with muscle strength, nor address non-physical complications of critical illness. The aim of this review was to consider which patients are likely to require rehabilitation following critical illness and to perform an integrative review of the available evidence of content and nature of exercise rehabilitation programmes for survivors of critical illness following hospital discharge. Literature databases and clinical trials registries were searched using appropriate terms and groups of terms. Inclusion criteria specified the reporting of rehabilitation programmes for patients following critical illness post-hospital discharge. Ten items, including data from published studies and protocols from trial registries, were included. Because of the variability in study methodology and inadequate level of detail of reported exercise prescription, at present there can be no clear recommendations for clinical practice from this review. As this area of clinical practice remains in its relative infancy, further evidence is required both to identify which patients are most likely to benefit and to determine the optimum content and format of exercise rehabilitation programmes for patients following critical illness post-hospital discharge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/cc11219

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise is recognized to provide a potent anabolic stimulus to muscle, even among patients who are mostly limited to bed rest.

    “Exercise is recognized to provide a potent anabolic stimulus to muscle, even among patients who are mostly limited to bed rest.153,157,168”

    From Evidence-Based Recommendations for Optimal Dietary Protein Intake in Older People: A Position Paper From the PROT-AGE Study Group (2013) · cites this paper as [168]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes prolonged immobility as a risk factor for ICU-acquired weakness and presents rehabilitation as a way to improve muscular strength and endurance. It also reports benefits from early mobilisation in the ICU. The paper does not establish that exercise provides a potent anabolic stimulus to muscle in patients mostly limited to bed rest. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Jonghe B Lacherade J-C Sharshar T Outin H Intensive care unitacquired weakness: Risk factors and prevention Crit Care Med 2009 37 S309 S315 20046115

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Connolly, B., Denehy, L., Brett, S., Elliott, D., & Hart, N.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hart, Nicholas
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2012
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
226
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139423869
Cited by
49
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Imperial College London
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
exercise rehabilitation, critical illness survivors, post-discharge rehabilitation, ICU-acquired weakness, exercise prescription, physical function
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Humans, Patient Discharge, Quality of Life, Time Factors, Critical Illness, Survivors, Muscle Weakness, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review