‘Polishing the Kaswentha’: a Haudenosaunee view of environmental cooperation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Kaswentha remains salient today where it is being applied to environmental protection and restoration programmes, water quality monitoring projects and resource co-management initiatives.
“Though a historical model of coexistence, it remains salient today where it is being applied to environmental protection and restoration programmes (Ransom & Ettenger, 2001), water quality monitoring projects (McGregor, 2002) and resource co-management initiatives (Stevenson, 2006).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Ransom & Ettenger, 2001
The Kaswentha is a 17th-century treaty belt recording an agreement between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and Dutch settlers in eastern New York.
“The Kaswentha (Haudenosaunee for “Two Row Wampum”; Figure 1a) is a 17th century treaty belt to record an agreement between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and Dutch settlers in eastern New York (Ransom & Ettenger, 2001).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Ransom & Ettenger, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
“Though a historical model of coexistence, it remains salient today where it is being applied to environmental protection and restoration programmes (Ransom & Ettenger, 2001), water quality monitoring projects (McGregor, 2002) and resource co-management initiatives (Stevenson, 2006).”
BackgroundRelational Systems Thinking: That's How Change is Going to Come, From Our Earth Mother
Goodchild, M. (2021) · Journal of Awareness-Based Systems Change · doi:10.47061/jabsc.v1i1.577 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Leonard, K. (2021) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2020.1862739 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Whyte, K. (2020) · The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science · doi:10.4324/9780429507731-12 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ransom, J. W., & Ettenger, K. T.
- Corresponding author
- Ransom, James W
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 219-228
- ISSN
- 1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977627043
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- Iroquois, environmental cooperation, Indigenous sovereignty, indigenous autonomy, treaty rights, indigenous knowledge, collaborative partnerships, intergovernmental relations, environmental policy, cultural identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
