Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence

Marland, Gregg, Fruit, Kristy, Sedjo, Roger·2001·Environmental Science & Policy
DOI 10.1016/s1462-9011(01)00038-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1462-9011(01)00038-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Colombia Ministry of the Environment, 2000. Expiring CERs, A Proposal to Addressing the Permanence Issue, pp. 23–26 in United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC/SBSTA/2000/MISC.8, available at www.unfccc.de.
  2. Fearnside, 1997, Monitoring needs to transform Amazonian forest into a global warming-mitigation option, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2, 285, 10.1007/BF02437209 · DOI
  3. Fearnside, 2000, Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 5, 239, 10.1023/A:1009625122628 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1995. Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000. Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  6. Kauppi, P., Sedjo, R., Apps, M., Cerri, C., Fujimori, T., Janzen, H., Krankina, O., Makundi, W., Marland, G., Masera, O., Nabuurs, G.-J., Razali, W., Ravindranath, N.H. Chapter 4. Technical and Economic Potential of Options to Enhance, Maintain, and Manage Biological Carbon Reservoirs and Geo-engineering. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., Pan, J., (Eds.), Climate Change 2001: Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (pp. 301–343).
  7. Marland, 1997, Forest/biomass mitigation strategies: does the timing of carbon reductions matter?, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, S213, 10.1080/10643389709388521 · DOI
  8. Moura Costa, 2000, An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration – description and applications in forestry, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 5, 51, 10.1023/A:1009697625521 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Richards, 1997, The time value of carbon in bottom-up studies, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, S279, 10.1080/10643389709388526 · DOI
  10. Schwarze, 2000, The long-term requirement for CDM forestry and economic liability, Journal of Environment and Development, 9, 384, 10.1177/107049650000900404 · DOI
  11. Tipper, 1998, Quantification and regulation of carbon offsets from forestry: comparison of alternative methodologies, with special reference to Chiapas, Mexico, Commonwealth Forestry Review, 77, 219
  12. Van Kooten, 1997, Conceptual issues related to carbon sequestration: uncertainty and time, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 27, S65, 10.1080/10643389709388510 · DOI

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Marland, G., Fruit, K., & Sedjo, R.
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
259-268
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1462-9011(01)00038-7
OpenAlex
W2081683180
Cited by
275
References
0
FWCI
31.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1462-9011(01)00038-7
The paper
Marland, G., Fruit, K., & Sedjo, R. (2001). Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1462-9011(01)00038-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.