Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An equivalence factor between CO2 avoidedemissions and sequestration – description andapplications in forestry

Open access
Moura Costa, Pedro, Wilson, Charlie·2000·Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1009697625521

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Dixon, R.K., Winjun, J.K., Adrasko, K.J. and Schroeder, P.E.: 1994, 'Integrated land-use systems: assessment of promising agroforestry and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration', Climate Change 30, 1–23.
  2. Dobes, L., Enting, I. and Mitchell, C.: 1998, 'Accounting for carbon sinks: the problem of time', in L. Dobes (ed.), Trading Greenhouse emissions: some Australian perspectives, Occasional papers No. 115, Bureau of Transport Economics, Australia.
  3. Fearnside, P.: 1997, 'Monitoring needs to transform Amazonian forest maintenance into a global warming-mitigation option', Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2, 285–302. · DOI
  4. Greenhouse Challenge Office: 1997, Greenhouse Challenge Carbon Sinks Workbook: A Discussion Paper, Greenhouse Challenge Office, Canberra, Australia.
  5. Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephramus, J.J. (eds.).: 1990, Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 365 pp.
  6. Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney, S.K. (eds.).: 1992, Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 198 pp.
  7. Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Bruce, J., Hoesung Lee, Callander, B.A., Haites, E., Harris, N. and Maskell, K. (eds.): 1994, Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the 1992 IPCC IS92 Emissions Scenario, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 339 pp.
  8. Moura Costa, P.: 1996, 'Tropical forestry practices for carbon sequestration', in A. Schulte and D. Schone (eds.), Dipterocarp Forest Ecosystems-Towards sustainable management, World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 308–334. · doi:10.1142/9789814261043_0014
  9. Price, C. and Willis, R.: 1993, 'Time, discounting and the valuation of forestry's carbon fluxes', Commonwealth Forestry Review 72, 265–271.
  10. Schroeder, P.: 1992, 'Carbon storage potential of short rotation tropical tree plantations', Forest Ecology and Management 50, 31–41. · DOI
  11. Tipper, R. and de Jong, B.H.: 1998, 'Quantification and regulation of carbon offsets from forestry: comparison of alternative methodologies, with special reference to Chiapas, Mexico', Commonwealth Forestry Review 77, 219–228.
  12. Wigley, T.M.L.: 1994, 'How important are carbon cycle model uncertainties?', in T. Hanisch (ed.), Climate Change and the Agenda for Research, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 169–191.

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Moura Costa, P., & Wilson, C.
Venue
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Published
2000-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
51-60
ISSN
  • 1381-2386 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1596
OpenAlex
W2203023211
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An equivalence factor between CO2 avoidedemissions and sequestration – description andapplications in forestry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1023/a:1009697625521
The paper
Moura Costa, P., & Wilson, C. (2000). An equivalence factor between CO2 avoidedemissions and sequestration – description andapplications in forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1009697625521

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.