Bloom Energy deploys 40 MW in US Northeast
Abstract
California-based Bloom Energy has begun to deploy a portfolio of more than 40 MW of solid oxide fuel cell power plants in the northeastern US, through a series of agreements under a Community Distributed Generation (CDG) programme. The initial portfolio of projects is being deployed in New York.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One reason for increased awareness in this domain is a significant increase in ICS cyberattacks.
“One of the reasons for the increased awareness in this domain is a significant increase in ICS cyberattacks (i.e., the USA’s largest fuel-pipeline ransomware attack) [16].”
From Industrial IoT, Cyber Threats, and Standards Landscape: Evaluation and Roadmap (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Industrial IoT, Cyber Threats, and Standards Landscape: Evaluation and Roadmap
Dhirani, L. L., Armstrong, E., & Newe, T. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21113901 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
- Venue
- Fuel Cells Bulletin
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 2021
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1464-2859 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-717X
- OpenAlex
- W4250748755
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fuel Cells Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Keywords
- Bloom Energy, solid oxide fuel cells, fuel cell power plants, distributed generation, New York, northeastern United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review