Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: IV. A conceptual case for the affect circumplex
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In both studies [7],[8], psychological responses were elicited before and after exercise but not during.
“In both studies [7], [8], the psychological responses were elicited before and after exercise but not during, as has been previously recommended [9].”
From Continuous and high-intensity interval training: Which promotes higher pleasure? (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 178 · Cited by 242
- Authors
- Ekkekakis, P., & Petruzzello, S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Psychology of sport and exercise
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-63
- ISSN
- 1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164158597
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 178
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- affect measurement, circumplex model of affect, acute exercise, self-report measures, affective evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
