Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating tumour cells as prognostic markers in progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: a reanalysis of IMMC38 trial data

Open access
Scher, Howard I, Jia, Xiaoyu, de Bono, Johann S, Fleisher, Martin, Pienta, Kenneth J, Raghavan, Derek, Heller, Glenn·2009·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

SUMMARY Background To assess the use of circulating tumor cell (CTC) number as a continuous variable as a prognostic factor for survival, and for the clinical management of patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods The study included 164 men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. CTCs were isolated by immunomagnetic capture from blood samples drawn at baseline and after the initiation of first-line chemotherapy. Baseline variables including CTC number, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and posttreatment variables (fold change in CTCs and PSA) were tested for association with survival using the Cox proportional hazards models. The concordance probability estimate was used to gauge the discriminatory strength of the informative factors in separating low- and high-risk patients. Findings At baseline, variables associated with increased risk of death were a high LDH (hazard ratio [HR] 6.44), CTC number (HR 1.58), and PSA (HR 1.26), low albumin (HR 0.10), and low hemoglobin (HR 0.72) (all p<0.001). At 4, 8, and 12 weeks posttreatment, changes in CTC number were strongly associated with risk (all p≤0.001), while changes in PSA were modestly associated (p=0.04 to 0.8). The combination of factors most predictive of survival were LDH and CTC number (concordance probability estimate 0.72–0.75). Time to CTC progression was modestly associated with time to death. Interpretation CTC number, analyzed as a continuous variable, was more predictive of survival than PSA at baseline and during patient follow-up, and can be used to monitor disease status. A model including baseline and posttreatment CTC, independent of discrete cutoff values, and baseline LDH was most predictive. The prospective evaluation of CTC number as an intermediate endpoint of survival in randomized prospective clinical trials is warranted. Funding The Prostate Cancer Foundation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70340-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Scher, H. I., Jia, X., de Bono, J. S., Fleisher, M., Pienta, K. J., Raghavan, D., & Heller, G.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
233-239
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100115202
Cited by
611
References
2
FWCI
39.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating tumour cells as prognostic markers in progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: a reanalysis of IMMC38 trial data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70340-1
The paper
Scher, H. I., Jia, X., de Bono, J. S., Fleisher, M., Pienta, K. J., Raghavan, D., & Heller, G. (2009). Circulating tumour cells as prognostic markers in progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: a reanalysis of IMMC38 trial data. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70340-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.