The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY Background The 21-gene Recurrence Score assay (RS) is prognostic for women with node-negative, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) treated with tamoxifen. A low RS predicts little benefit of chemotherapy. For node-positive BC, we investigated whether RS was prognostic in women treated with tamoxifen alone and whether it identified those who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite higher recurrence risks. Methods The phase III trial S8814 for postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive BC showed that CAF chemotherapy prior to tamoxifen (CAF-T) added survival benefit to tamoxifen alone. Optional tumor banking yielded specimens for RS determination by RT-PCR. We evaluated the effect of RS on disease-free survival (DFS) by treatment group (tamoxifen versus CAF-T) using Cox regression adjusting for number of positive nodes. Findings There were 367 specimens (40% of parent trial) with sufficient RNA (tamoxifen, 148; CAF-T, 219). The RS was prognostic in the tamoxifen arm (p=0.006). There was no CAF benefit in the low RS group (logrank p=0.97; HR=1.02, 95% CI (0.54,1.93)), but major DFS improvement for the high RS subset (logrank p=.03; HR=0.59, 95% CI (0.35, 1.01)), adjusting for number of positive nodes. The RS-by-treatment interaction was significant in the first 5 years (p=0.029), with no additional prediction beyond 5 years (p=0.58), though the cumulative benefit remained at 10 years. Results were similar for overall survival and BC-specific survival. Interpretation In this retrospective analysis, the RS is prognostic for tamoxifen-treated patients with positive nodes and predicts significant CAF benefit in tumors with a high RS. A low RS identifies women who may not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy despite positive nodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK).
for the Statistics Subcommittee of the NCI-EORTC Working Group on Cancer Diagnostics, McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602678 · Cited by 1,394
Cited by
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
Sparano, J. A., Gray, R. J., Makower, D. F., Pritchard, K. I., Albain, K. S., Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Dees, E. C., Goetz, M. P., Olson, J. A., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1804710 · Cited by 2,397
Self-citationNCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018
Benson, A. B., Venook, A. P., Al-Hawary, M. M., Cederquist, L., Chen, Y.-J., Ciombor, K. K., Cohen, S., Cooper, H. S., Deming, D., Engstrom, P. F., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0021 · Cited by 806
Hatzis, C. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.593 · Cited by 699
Molecular biology in breast cancer: Intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways
Eroles, P., Bosch, A., Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, J., & Lluch, A. (2012) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.11.005 · Cited by 624
Prat, A., Cheang, M. C. U., Martín, M., Parker, J. S., Carrasco, E., Caballero, R., Tyldesley, S., Gelmon, K., Bernard, P. S., Nielsen, T. O., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.43.4134 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Albain, K. S., Barlow, W. E., Shak, S., Hortobagyi, G. N., Livingston, R. B., Yeh, I.-T., Ravdin, P., Bugarini, R., Baehner, F. L., Davidson, N. E., Sledge, G. W., Winer, E. P., Hudis, C., Ingle, J. N., Perez, E. A., Pritchard, K. I., Shepherd, L., Gralow, J. R., Yoshizawa, C., Allred, D. C., Osborne, C. K., & Hayes, D. F.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-65
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113344831
- Cited by
- 1,407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70314-6
- The paper
- Albain, K. S., Barlow, W. E., Shak, S., Hortobagyi, G. N., Livingston, R. B., Yeh, I.-T., Ravdin, P., Bugarini, R., Baehner, F. L., Davidson, N. E., Sledge, G. W., Winer, E. P., Hudis, C., Ingle, J. N., Perez, E. A., Pritchard, K. I., Shepherd, L., Gralow, J. R., Yoshizawa, C., . . . Hayes, D. F. (2010). Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70314-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.