The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor–Positive Tumor Cells Within Immunohistochemically Defined Luminal A Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Current immunohistochemical (IHC)-based definitions of luminal A and B breast cancers are imperfect when compared with multigene expression-based assays. In this study, we sought to improve the IHC subtyping by examining the pathologic and gene expression characteristics of genomically defined luminal A and B subtypes. Patients and Methods: Gene expression and pathologic features were collected from primary tumors across five independent cohorts: British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) tamoxifen-treated only, Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama 9906 trial, BCCA no systemic treatment cohort, PAM50 microarray training data set, and a combined publicly available microarray data set. Optimal cutoffs of percentage of progesterone receptor (PR) –positive tumor cells to predict survival were derived and independently tested. Multivariable Cox models were used to test the prognostic significance. Results: Clinicopathologic comparisons among luminal A and B subtypes consistently identified higher rates of PR positivity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negativity, and histologic grade 1 in luminal A tumors. Quantitative PR gene and protein expression were also found to be significantly higher in luminal A tumors. An empiric cutoff of more than 20% of PR-positive tumor cells was statistically chosen and proved significant for predicting survival differences within IHC-defined luminal A tumors independently of endocrine therapy administration. Finally, no additional prognostic value within hormonal receptor (HR) –positive/HER2-negative disease was observed with the use of the IHC4 score when intrinsic IHC-based subtypes were used that included the more than 20% PR-positive tumor cells and vice versa. Conclusion: Semiquantitative IHC expression of PR adds prognostic value within the current IHC-based luminal A definition by improving the identification of good outcome breast cancers. The new proposed IHC-based definition of luminal A tumors is HR positive/HER2 negative/Ki-67 less than 14%, and PR more than 20%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Perou, C. M., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M. B., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., Rees, C. A., Pollack, J. R., Ross, D. T., Johnsen, H., Akslen, L. A., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021093 · Cited by 16,261
Self-citationSupervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Parker, J. S., Mullins, M., Cheang, M. C. U., Leung, S., Voduc, D., Vickery, T., Davies, S., Fauron, C., He, X., Hu, Z., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.1370 · Cited by 4,721
Self-citationGoldhirsch, A., Wood, W. C., Coates, A. S., Gelber, R. D., Thürlimann, B., & Senn, H.-J. (2011) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr304 · Cited by 3,836
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60993-8 · Cited by 3,075
Paik, S., Tang, G., Shak, S., Kim, C., Baker, J., Kim, W., Cronin, M., Baehner, F. L., Watson, D., Bryant, J., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.7985 · Cited by 2,579
Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
Cheang, M. C. U., Chia, S. K., Voduc, D., Gao, D., Leung, S., Snider, J., Watson, M., Davies, S., Bernard, P. S., Parker, J. S., et al. (2009) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp082 · Cited by 2,249
Self-citationAlbain, K. S., Barlow, W. E., Shak, S., Hortobagyi, G. N., Livingston, R. B., Yeh, I.-T., Ravdin, P., Bugarini, R., Baehner, F. L., Davidson, N. E., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70314-6 · Cited by 1,407
Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer
Prat, A., & Perou, C. M. (2011) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2010.11.003 · Cited by 1,343
Self-citationNielsen, T. O., Parker, J. S., Leung, S., Voduc, D., Ebbert, M., Vickery, T., Davies, S. R., Snider, J., Stijleman, I. J., Reed, J., et al. (2010) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1282 · Cited by 801
Self-citation
Cited by
Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline update
Allison, K. H., Hammond, M. E. H., Dowsett, M., McKernin, S. E., Carey, L. A., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hayes, D. F., Lakhani, S. R., Chavez-MacGregor, M., Perlmutter, J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.02309 · Cited by 1,574
Self-citationAge-specific changes in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes: a focus on older women
Jenkins, E. O., Deal, A. M., Anders, C. K., Prat, A., Perou, C. M., Carey, L. A., & Muss, H. B. (2014) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0184 · Cited by 165
Self-citationGloyeske, N. C., Dabbs, D. J., & Bhargava, R. (2014) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/ajcp34cysatwfdpq · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Prat, A., Cheang, M. C. U., Martín, M., Parker, J. S., Carrasco, E., Caballero, R., Tyldesley, S., Gelmon, K., Bernard, P. S., Nielsen, T. O., & Perou, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2013-01-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-209
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2125702566
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor–Positive Tumor Cells Within Immunohistochemically Defined Luminal A Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2012.43.4134
- The paper
- Prat, A., Cheang, M. C. U., Martín, M., Parker, J. S., Carrasco, E., Caballero, R., Tyldesley, S., Gelmon, K., Bernard, P. S., Nielsen, T. O., & Perou, C. M. (2013). Prognostic Significance of Progesterone Receptor–Positive Tumor Cells Within Immunohistochemically Defined Luminal A Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.43.4134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.