The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weekly bortezomib in combination with temsirolimus in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation study
Abstract
Background Multiple myeloma is the second most prevalent haematological malignancy and is incurable. Our aim was to assess the response and safety of the combination of temsirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) and bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods We did an open-label, dose-escalation study in three centres in the USA. Patients were enrolled from June, 2007, to December, 2009. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after one or more treatment (including lenalidomide, bortezomib, or thalidomide), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients were assigned a dose level in the order of their entry into the study. Phase 1 was to assess the safety and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination and phase 2 was to assess overall response rate at the MTD. Intravenous temsirolimus was given at 15 or 25 mg and intravenous bortezomib at 1·3 or 1·6 mg/m(2) once a week, with dose escalation until dose-limiting adverse events were recorded in two of the three people in the dose cohort. Use of steroids were not permitted. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a partial response or better. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, with all patients who had been enrolled included. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00483262. Findings 20 patients were enrolled into the phase 1 study and 43 into phase 2. All patients were heavily pretreated (median five lines in the phase 1 cohort, and four lines in the phase 2 cohort). The MTD was determined to be 1·6 mg/m(2) bortezomib on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in combination with 25 mg temsirolimus on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, for a cycle of 35 days. In the phase 2 study, the proportion of patients with a partial response or better was 33% (14 of 43; 90% CI 21-47). Long-term follow-up of patients is ongoing. There were three deaths during treatment in the phase 1 and 2 studies: one patient died of septic shock in the phase 1 study; one patient died with H1N1 influenza infection and one died with cardiac amyloid and ventricular arrhythmia unrelated to treatment in the phase 2 study. In the phase 1 study, the most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (13 patients), lymphopenia (ten), neutropenia (nine), leucopenia (seven), and anaemia (five). In the phase 2 study, the most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (25 patients), lymphopenia (24), neutropenia (17), leucopenia (ten), anaemia (seven), and diarrhoea (five). Four patients in the phase 1 study had sensory peripheral neuropathy (grade 2 or less); in the phase 2 study, 11 had sensory peripheral neuropathy (all grade 2 or less) and seven motor peripheral neuropathy (one grade 3, six grade 2 or less). Interpretation mTOR inhibitors could have a role in combination with weekly bortezomib for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma without the addition of steroids. Funding Millennium Inc, Pfizer Inc, Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Temsirolimus combined with weekly bortezomib has shown promising results in clinical trials for relapsed/refractory MM.
“Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, has been studied in combination with weekly bortezomib for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). This combination therapy has shown promising results in clinical trials, indicating its potential efficacy in this patient population [67].”
From Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Kyle, 2004, Multiple myeloma, N Engl J Med, 351, 1860, 10.1056/NEJMra041875 · DOI
- Kumar, 2008, Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies, Blood, 111, 2516, 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129 · DOI
- Rosen, 2006, AKT and cancer—is it all mTOR?, Cancer Cell, 10, 254, 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.001 · DOI
- Yao, 2006, PTEN loss promotes rasHa-mediated papillomatogenesis via dual up-regulation of AKT activity and cell cycle deregulation but malignant conversion proceeds via PTEN-associated pathways, Cancer Res, 66, 1302, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2341 · DOI
- Li, 2007, Why is PTEN an important tumor suppressor?, J Cell Biochem, 102, 1368, 10.1002/jcb.21593 · DOI
- Cantrell, 2001, Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signalling pathways, J Cell Sci, 114, 1439, 10.1242/jcs.114.8.1439 · DOI
- Vara, 2004, PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and cancer, Cancer Treat Rev, 30, 193, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2003.07.007 · DOI
- Hennessy, 2005, Exploiting the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 4, 988, 10.1038/nrd1902 · DOI
- Pene, 2002, Role of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and mTOR/P70S6-kinase pathways in the proliferation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma, Oncogene, 21, 6587, 10.1038/sj.onc.1205923 · DOI
- Dancey, 2004, Molecular targeting: PI3 kinase pathway, Ann Oncol, 15, iv233, 10.1093/annonc/mdh932 · DOI
- Raje, 2004, Combination of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin and CC-5013 has synergistic activity in multiple myeloma, Blood, 104, 4188, 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2281 · DOI
- Frost, 2004, In vivo antitumor effects of the mTOR inhibitor CCI-779 against human multiple myeloma cells in a xenograft model, Blood, 104, 4181, 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1153 · DOI
- Gera, 2004, AKT activity determines sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors by regulating cyclin D1 and c-myc expression, J Biol Chem, 279, 2737, 10.1074/jbc.M309999200 · DOI
- Shi, 2002, Enhanced sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells containing PTEN mutations to CCI-779, Cancer Res, 62, 5027
- Shi, 2005, Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors activate the AKT kinase in multiple myeloma cells by up-regulating the insulin-like growth factor receptor/insulin receptor substrate-1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase cascade, Mol Cancer Ther, 4, 1533, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0068 · DOI
- Francis, 2006, Combination mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor rapamycin and HSP90 inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin has synergistic activity in multiple myeloma, Clin Cancer Res, 12, 6826, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1331 · DOI
- Hideshima, 2006, Perifosine, an oral bioactive novel alkylphospholipid, inhibits Akt and induces in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma cells, Blood, 107, 4053, 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3434 · DOI
- Ikeda, 2010, PI3K/p110δ is a novel therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, Blood, 116, 1460, 10.1182/blood-2009-06-222943 · DOI
- McMillin, 2009, Antimyeloma activity of the orally bioavailable dual phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor NVP-BEZ235, Cancer Res, 69, 5835, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4285 · DOI
- Witzig, 2005, Phase II trial of single-agent temsirolimus (CCI-779) for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma, J Clin Oncol, 23, 5347, 10.1200/JCO.2005.13.466 · DOI
- Hudes, 2007, Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma, N Engl J Med, 356, 2271, 10.1056/NEJMoa066838 · DOI
- Farag, 2006, Phase II trial of temsirolimus (CCI-779) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): preliminary results, Proc Soc Am Clin Oncol, 24, 7616, 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.7616 · DOI
- Durie, 2006, International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma, Leukemia, 20, 1467, 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284 · DOI · Paper page
- Kyle, 2007, American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma, J Clin Oncol, 25, 2464, 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1269 · DOI
- Bringhen, 2010, Efficacy and safety of once weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients, Blood, 116, 4745, 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294983 · DOI · Paper page
- Lacy, 2010, Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low dose dexamethasone (Pom/dex) is active and well tolerated in lenalidomide refractory multiple myeloma (MM), Leukemia, 24, 1934, 10.1038/leu.2010.190 · DOI · Paper page
- Siegel, 2010, Results of PX-171-003-A1, an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 (Ph 2) study of carfilzomib (CFZ) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM), Blood, 116
- San-Miguel, 2010, Phase Ib study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) plus intravenous bortezomib in patients (Pts) with relapsed (Rel) or Rel and refractory (Ref) multiple myeloma (MM), Proc Soc Am Clin Oncol, 28, 8001, 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.8001 · DOI
- Richardson, 2010, Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, Blood, 116, 679, 10.1182/blood-2010-02-268862 · DOI · Paper page
- Reeder, 2009, Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: high response rates in a phase II clinical trial, Leukemia, 23, 1337, 10.1038/leu.2009.26 · DOI
- Toschi, 2009, Regulation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 complex assembly by phosphatidic acid: competition with rapamycin, Mol Cell Biol, 29, 1411, 10.1128/MCB.00782-08 · DOI
- Hoang, 2010, Targeting TORC2 in multiple myeloma with a new mTOR kinase inhibitor, Blood, 116, 4560, 10.1182/blood-2010-05-285726 · DOI
- Cybulski, 2009, TOR complex 2: a signaling pathway of its own, Trends Biochem Sci, 34, 620, 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.09.004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiple myeloma: signaling pathways and targeted therapy
Lu, Q., Yang, D., Li, H., Niu, T., & Tong, A. (2024) · Molecular biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-024-00188-w · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghobrial, I. M., Weller, E., Vij, R., Munshi, N. C., Banwait, R., Bagshaw, M., Schlossman, R., Leduc, R., Chuma, S., Kunsman, J., Laubach, J., Jakubowiak, A. J., Maiso, P., Roccaro, A., Armand, P., Dollard, A., Warren, D., Harris, B., Poon, T., Sam, A., Rodig, S., Anderson, K. C., & Richardson, P. G.
- Affiliations
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ghobrial, Irene M
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-272
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161574806
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Keywords
- relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, bortezomib, temsirolimus, mTOR inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, combination therapy, maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, partial response, treatment safety, weekly dosing, lenalidomide, thalidomide, steroid-sparing therapy, immunomodulators
- MeSH terms
- Bortezomib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Boronic Acids, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Pyrazines, Recurrence, Sirolimus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review