Cited by 861Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Open access
Richardson, Paul G., Weller, Edie, Lonial, Sagar, Jakubowiak, Andrzej J., Jagannath, Sundar, Raje, Noopur S., Avigan, David E., Xie, Wanling +17 more·2010·Blood

Abstract

This phase 1/2 study is the first prospective evaluation of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone in front-line myeloma. Patients (N = 66) received 3-week cycles (n = 8) of bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11), lenalidomide 15 to 25 mg (days 1-14), and dexamethasone 40 or 20 mg (days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12). Responding patients proceeded to maintenance or transplantation. Phase 2 dosing was determined to be bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, lenalidomide 25 mg, and dexamethasone 20 mg. Most common toxicities included sensory neuropathy (80%) and fatigue (64%), with only 27%/2% and 32%/3% grade 2/3, respectively. In addition, 32% reported neuropathic pain (11%/3%, grade 2/3). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included lymphopenia (14%), neutropenia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). Thrombosis was rare (6% overall), and no treatment-related mortality was observed. Rate of partial response was 100% in both the phase 2 population and overall, with 74% and 67% each achieving very good partial response or better. Twenty-eight patients (42%) proceeded to undergo transplantation. With median follow-up of 21 months, estimated 18-month progression-free and overall survival for the combination treatment with/without transplantation were 75% and 97%, respectively. Lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone demonstrates favorable tolerability and is highly effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. This study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00378105.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-02-268862

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the high-risk cytogenetic subset, maintenance therapy with proteasome inhibitors alone or in combination with lenalidomide seems to be more effective than single-agent lenalidomide.

    “In this subset of patients, maintenance therapy with proteasome inhibitors alone or in combination with lenalidomide seems to be more effective than single-agent lenalidomide34,35.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [41]Kumar S, Flinn I, Noga S, et al. Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide (VDCR) has high efficacy in frontline MM. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009;9(suppl):S43–S44. Abstract 247. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, P. G., Weller, E., Lonial, S., Jakubowiak, A. J., Jagannath, S., Raje, N. S., Avigan, D. E., Xie, W., Ghobrial, I. M., Schlossman, R. L., Mazumder, A., Munshi, N. C., Vesole, D. H., Joyce, R., Kaufman, J. L., Doss, D., Warren, D. L., Lunde, L. E., Kaster, S., DeLaney, C., Hideshima, T., Mitsiades, C. S., Knight, R., Esseltine, D.-L., & Anderson, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
  • Takeda Oncology (United States) (US)
Venue
Blood
Published
2010-08-05
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
679-686
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1969648097
Cited by
861
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 86
FWCI
57.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01ca078378-15)
  • Takeda Oncology
  • National Cancer Institute (P01-CA078378, P50CA100707)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, multiple myeloma, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, first-line therapy, combination chemotherapy, maintenance therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, sensory neuropathy, hematologic toxicity, progression-free survival, overall survival
MeSH terms
Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Boronic Acids, Combined Modality Therapy, Dexamethasone, Fatigue, Hematologic Diseases, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Pain, Pyrazines, Remission Induction, Sensation Disorders, Thalidomide, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review