The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background Radical whole-gland therapy can lead to significant genitourinary and rectal side-effects for men with localised prostate cancer. We report on whether selective focal ablation of unifocal and multifocal cancer lesions can reduce this treatment burden. Methods Men aged 45–80 years were eligible for this prospective development study if they had low-risk to high-risk localised prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen [PSA] ≤15 ng/mL, Gleason score ≤4 + 3, stage ≤T2), with no previous androgen deprivation or treatment for prostate cancer, and who could safely undergo multiparametric MRI and have a general anaesthetic. Patients received focal therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasound, delivered to all known cancer lesions, with a margin of normal tissue, identified on multiparametric MRI, template prostate-mapping biopsies, or both. Primary endpoints were adverse events (serious and otherwise) and urinary symptoms and erectile function assessed using patient questionnaires. Analyses were done on a per-protocol basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00561314. Findings 42 men were recruited between June 27, 2007, and June 30, 2010; one man died from an unrelated cause (pneumonia) 3 months after treatment and was excluded from analyses. After treatment, one man was admitted to hospital for acute urinary retention, and another had stricture interventions requiring hospital admission. Nine men (22%, 95% CI 11–38) had self-resolving, mild to moderate, intermittent dysuria (median duration 5·0 days [IQR 2·5–18·5]). Urinary debris occurred in 14 men (34%, 95% CI 20–51), with a median duration of 14·5 days (IQR 6·0–16·5). Urinary tract infection was noted in seven men (17%, 95% CI 7–32). Median overall International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) scores were similar at baseline and at 12 months (p=0·060), as were median IIEF-15 scores for intercourse satisfaction (p=0·454), sexual desire (p=0·644), and overall satisfaction (p=0·257). Significant deteriorations between baseline and 12 months were noted for IIEF-15 erectile (p=0·042) and orgasmic function (p=0·003). Of 35 men with good baseline function, 31 (89%, 95% CI 73–97) had erections sufficient for penetration 12 months after focal therapy. Median UCLA Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary incontinence scores were similar at baseline as and 12 months (p=0·045). There was an improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms, assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), between baseline and 12 months (p=0·026), but the IPSS-quality of life score showed no difference between baseline and 12 months (p=0·655). All 38 men with no baseline urinary incontinence were leak-free and pad-free by 9 months. All 40 men pad-free at baseline were pad-free by 3 months and maintained pad-free continence at 12 months. No significant difference was reported in median Trial Outcomes Index scores between baseline and 12 months (p=0·113) but significant improvement was shown in median Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Prostate (p=0·045) and median FACT-General scores (p=0·041). No histological evidence of cancer was identified in 30 of 39 men biopsied at 6 months (77%, 95% CI 61–89); 36 (92%, 79–98) were free of clinically significant cancer. After retreatment in four men, 39 of 41 (95%, 95% CI 83–99) had no evidence of disease on multiparametric MRI at 12 months. Interpretation Focal therapy of individual prostate cancer lesions, whether multifocal or unifocal, leads to a low rate of genitourinary side-effects and an encouraging rate of early absence of clinically significant prostate cancer. Funding Medical Research Council (UK), Pelican Cancer Foundation, and St Peters Trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0 · Cited by 5,849
Esper, P., Mo, F., Chodak, G., Sinner, M., Cella, D., & Pienta, K. J. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00459-7 · Cited by 696
Cited by
New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review
Valerio, M., Cerantola, Y., Eggener, S. E., Lepor, H., Polascik, T. J., Villers, A., & Emberton, M. (2017) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.044 · Cited by 300
Self-citationDonati, O. F., Mazaheri, Y., Afaq, A., Vargas, H. A., Zheng, J., Moskowitz, C. S., Hricak, H., & Akin, O. (2014) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.13130973 · Cited by 295
High intensity focused ultrasound: The fundamentals, clinical applications and research trends
Elhelf, I. A. S., Albahar, H., Shah, U., Oto, A., Cressman, E., & Almekkawy, M. (2018) · Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.diii.2018.03.001 · Cited by 264
How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: The IDEAL framework for action
Hirst, A., Agha, R. A., Rosin, D., & McCulloch, P. (2013) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.016 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmed, H. U., Hindley, R. G., Dickinson, L., Freeman, A., Kirkham, A. P., Sahu, M., Scott, R., Allen, C., Van der Meulen, J., & Emberton, M.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 622-632
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143962930
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70121-3
- The paper
- Ahmed, H. U., Hindley, R. G., Dickinson, L., Freeman, A., Kirkham, A. P., Sahu, M., Scott, R., Allen, C., Van der Meulen, J., & Emberton, M. (2012). Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70121-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.