The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): a randomised, open-label, intergroup study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Trials of imatinib have provided evidence of activity in adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), but the drug's role when given with multidrug chemotherapy to children is unknown. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of oral imatinib in association with a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster intensive chemotherapy regimen and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for paediatric patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive ALL. METHODS: Patients aged 1-18 years recruited to national trials of front-line treatment for ALL were eligible if they had t(9;22)(q34;q11). Patients with abnormal renal or hepatic function, or an active systemic infection, were ineligible. Patients were enrolled by ten study groups between 2004 and 2009, and were classified as good risk or poor risk according to early response to induction treatment. Good-risk patients were randomly assigned by a web-based system with permuted blocks (size four) to receive post-induction imatinib with chemotherapy or chemotherapy only in a 1:1 ratio, while all poor-risk patients received post-induction imatinib with chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by study group. The chemotherapy regimen was modelled on a Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster high-risk backbone; all received four post-induction blocks of chemotherapy after which they became eligible for stem-cell transplantation. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival at 4 years in the good-risk group and event-free survival at 4 years in the poor-risk group, analysed by intention to treat and a secondary analysis of patients as treated. The trial is registered with EudraCT (2004-001647-30) and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00287105. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2004, and Dec 31, 2009, we screened 229 patients and enrolled 178: 108 were good risk and 70 poor risk. 46 good-risk patients were assigned to receive imatinib and 44 to receive no imatinib. Median follow-up was 3·1 years (IQR 2·0-4·6). 4-year disease-free survival was 72·9% (95% CI 56·1-84·1) in the good-risk, imatinib group versus 61·7% (45·0-74·7) in the good-risk, no imatinib group (p=0·24). The hazard ratio (HR) for failure, adjusted for minimal residual disease, was 0·63 (0·28-1·41; p=0·26). The as-treated analysis showed 4-year disease-free survival was 75·2% (61·0-84·9) for good-risk patients receiving imatinib and 55·9% (36·1-71·7) for those who did not receive imatinib (p=0·06). 4-year event-free survival for poor-risk patients was 53·5% (40·4-65·0). Serious adverse events were much the same in the good-risk groups, with infections caused by myelosuppression the most common. 16 patients in the good-risk imatinib group versus ten in the good-risk, no imatinib group (p=0·64), and 24 in the poor-risk group, had a serious adverse event. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggests that imatinib in conjunction with intensive chemotherapy is well tolerated and might be beneficial for treatment of children with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive ALL. FUNDING: Projet Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique-Cancer (France), Fondazione Tettamanti-De Marchi and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Italy), Novartis Germany, Cancer Research UK, Leukaemia Lymphoma Research, and Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malard, F., & Mohty, M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33018-1 · Cited by 773
Schultz, K. R., Carroll, A., Heerema, N. A., Bowman, W. P., Aledo, A., Slayton, W. B., Sather, H., Devidas, M., Zheng, H. W., Davies, S. M., et al. (2014) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2014.30 · Cited by 447
Perez-Andreu, V., Roberts, K. G., Harvey, R. C., Yang, W., Cheng, C., Pei, D., Xu, H., Gastier-Foster, J., E, S., Lim, J. Y.-S., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2803 · Cited by 305
Möricke, A., Zimmermann, M., Valsecchi, M. G., Stanulla, M., Biondi, A., Mann, G., Locatelli, F., Cazzaniga, G., Niggli, F., Aricò, M., et al. (2016) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2015-09-670729 · Cited by 283
Self-citationFavier, R., & Crépin, S. (2018) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1177/1740774518760565 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Biondi, A., Schrappe, M., De Lorenzo, P., Castor, A., Lucchini, G., Gandemer, V., Pieters, R., Stary, J., Escherich, G., Campbell, M., Li, C.-K., Vora, A., Aricò, M., Röttgers, S., Saha, V., & Valsecchi, M. G.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 936-945
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127226843
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): a randomised, open-label, intergroup study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70377-7
- The paper
- Biondi, A., Schrappe, M., De Lorenzo, P., Castor, A., Lucchini, G., Gandemer, V., Pieters, R., Stary, J., Escherich, G., Campbell, M., Li, C.-K., Vora, A., Aricò, M., Röttgers, S., Saha, V., & Valsecchi, M. G. (2012). Imatinib after induction for treatment of children and adolescents with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (EsPhALL): a randomised, open-label, intergroup study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70377-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.