The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY BACKGROUND Greater than 50% of recurrences in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer occur after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Biomarkers capable of improving the risk-benefit of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for these late recurrences would be clinically valuable. We compared the prognostic ability of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI), Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) and IHC4 for both early and late recurrence among patients with ER+, node negative (N0) disease within the ATAC clinical trial. METHODS BCI was performed from 1102 primary tumor samples from ER+ patients and two versions (BCI-C (primary) and BCI-L (secondary), based on cubic and linear combinations of the variables) were evaluated. RS and IHC4 values were previously derived. Prognostic discrimination for early (<5y) and late recurrence (5–10y) was assessed. To evaluate the ability of the biomarkers to predict recurrence beyond standard clinicopathological parameters, the likelihood-ratio chi-square (LR-Δχ2) was calculated from Cox proportional hazards models. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence (DR). FINDINGS In the primary analysis of 665 ER+ N0 patients, categorical BCI-C demonstrated significant differences in risk of DR over 10 years (P<0·0001). In the secondary analysis, BCI-L proved to be a much stronger predictor, and BCI-L, IHC4 and RS had significant prognostic performance for early DR (BCI-L, p<0·0002), while only BCI-L was significant for late DR (LR-Δχ2: 7·97, p=0·0048). For risk of early DR at 5 years, BCI-L classified 59% (390/665), 25% (166/665) and 16% (109/665) of patients with 1.3% (0.5% – 3.1%), 5.6% (2.9% – 10.5%) and 18.1% (12.0% – 27.0%) for low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. For risk of late DR at 10 years, BCI-L classified 61% (366/596), 25% (146/596) and 14% (84/596) of patients with 3.5% (2.0% – 6.1%), 13.4% (8.5% – 20.8%) and 13.3% (7.4% – 23.4%) for low, intermediate and high, respectively. INTERPRETATION While all three biomarkers predicted for early DR, BCI-L was the only significant prognostic for risk of late DR. The three BCI-L groups identified two risk populations for both early and late DR with 84% (556/665) of patients having low risk for early DR, and a smaller population (39%, 230/596) having high risk for late DR who may benefit from extended endocrine or other therapy. FUNDING Avon Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Breast Cancer Foundation, DOD Breast Cancer Research Program, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Breakthrough Breast Cancer through the Mary-Jean Mitchell Green Foundation, Astrazeneca, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cuzick, J., Sestak, I., Baum, M., Buzdar, A., Howell, A., Dowsett, M., & Forbes, J. F. (2010) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70257-6 · Cited by 1,674
Self-citation
Cited by
Curigliano, G., Burstein, H. J., Winer, E. P., Gnant, M., Dubsky, P., Loibl, S., Colleoni, M., Regan, M. M., Piccart-Gebhart, M., Senn, H.-J., et al. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx308 · Cited by 1,205
Self-citationNCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018
Benson, A. B., Venook, A. P., Al-Hawary, M. M., Cederquist, L., Chen, Y.-J., Ciombor, K. K., Cohen, S., Cooper, H. S., Deming, D., Engstrom, P. F., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0021 · Cited by 806
Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer
Giuliano, A. E., Edge, S. B., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6486-6 · Cited by 678
Tumor Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer
Turashvili, G., & Brogi, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2017.00227 · Cited by 561
Duffy, M. J., Harbeck, N., Nap, M., Molina, R., Nicolini, A., Senkus, E., & Cardoso, F. (2017) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.017 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Sgroi, D. C., Sestak, I., Cuzick, J., Zhang, Y., Schnabel, C. A., Schroeder, B., Erlander, M. G., Dunbier, A., Sidhu, K., Lopez-Knowles, E., Goss, P. E., & Dowsett, M.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1067-1076
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172045238
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70387-5
- The paper
- Sgroi, D. C., Sestak, I., Cuzick, J., Zhang, Y., Schnabel, C. A., Schroeder, B., Erlander, M. G., Dunbier, A., Sidhu, K., Lopez-Knowles, E., Goss, P. E., & Dowsett, M. (2013). Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70387-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.