Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment decisions in breast cancer often depend on detecting sentinel lymph node metastases, but pathology review is labor intensive and has significant interreader variability.
“Treatment decisions in breast cancer frequently hinge on the detection of such lesions (44), but pathology review remains labor intensive and subject to significant interreader variability (arXiv:1703.02442).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Perou, C., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S., Rees, C. A., Pollack, J., Ross, D., Johnsen, H., Akslen, L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021093 · Cited by 16,551 · see citing works
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E., Schwartz, J. N., Hagerty, K. L., Allred, D. C., Côté, R. J., Dowsett, M., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Hanna, W. M., Langer, A. S., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775 · Cited by 4,406 · see citing works
Hammond, M. E., Hayes, D. F., Dowsett, M., Allred, D. C., Hagerty, K. L., Badve, S., Fitzgibbons, P. L., Francis, G. D., Goldstein, N. S., Hayes, M. M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.6529 · Cited by 4,217 · see citing works
Wolff, A. C., Hammond, M. E. H., Hicks, D. G., Dowsett, M., McShane, L. M., Allison, K. H., Allred, D. C., Bartlett, J. M. S., Bilous, M., Fitzgibbons, P. L., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.50.9984 · Cited by 4,015 · see citing works
70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Cardoso, F., Veer, L. J. V., Bogaerts, J., Slaets, L., Viale, G., Delaloge, S., Pierga, J., Brain, E. G. C., Causeret, S., Delorenzi, M., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1602253 · Cited by 1,998 · see citing works
Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer
Sparano, J. A., Gray, R. J., Makower, D., Pritchard, K. I., Albain, K. S., Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Dees, E. C., Perez, E. A., Olson, J. A., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1510764 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
Sgroi, D. C., Šestak, I., Cuzick, J. M., Zhang, Y., Schnabel, C. A., Schroeder, B. E., Erlander, M. G., Dunbier, A. K., Sidhu, K., López‐Knowles, E., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70387-5 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Weiss, A. C., Chávez‐MacGregor, M., Lichtensztajn, D. Y., et al. (2017) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4298 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Nitz, U. A., Gluz, O., Christgen, M., Kates, R. E., Clemens, M., Malter, W., Nuding, B., Aktas, B., Küemmel, S., Reimer, T., et al. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4358-6 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting
Abdel-Rahman, O. M. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4577-x · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Stemmer, S. M., Steiner, M., Rizel, S., et al. (2017) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-017-0034-6 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions
Lotter, W., Hassett, M. J., Schultz, N., Kehl, K. L., Van Allen, E. M., & Cerami, E. (2024) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1199 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Application of liquid biopsy in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: Present and future
Li, X., Seebacher, N. A., Hornicek, F. J., Xiao, T., & Duan, Z. (2018) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2018.09.012 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Giuliano, A. E., Edge, S. B., & Hortobagyi, G. N.
- Affiliations
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Giuliano, Armando E.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Published
- 2018-04-18
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1783-1785
- ISSN
- 1068-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2800158081
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 8
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Annals of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
- Keywords
- breast cancer, tumor staging, TNM classification, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review