Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study
Abstract
Background With use of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor monotherapy for patients with activating EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), median progression-free survival has been extended to about 12 months. Nevertheless, new strategies are needed to further extend progression-free survival and overall survival with acceptable toxicity and tolerability for this population. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab compared with erlotinib alone in patients with non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation-positive disease.Methods In this open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients from 30 centres across Japan with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease received erlotinib 150 mg/day plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or erlotinib 150 mg/day monotherapy as a first-line therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as determined by an independent review committee. Randomisation was done with a dynamic allocation method, and the analysis used a modified intention-to-treat approach, including all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had tumour assessment at least once after randomisation. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-111390.Findings Between Feb 21, 2011, and March 5, 2012, 154 patients were enrolled. 77 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and bevacizumab and 77 to erlotinib alone, of whom 75 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 77 in the erlotinib alone group were included in the efficacy analyses. Median progression-free survival was 16·0 months (95% CI 13·9-18·1) with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9·7 months (5·7-11·1) with erlotinib alone (hazard ratio 0·54, 95% CI 0·36-0·79; log-rank test p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were rash (19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 15 [19%] patients in the erlotinib alone group), hypertension (45 [60%] vs eight [10%]), and proteinuria (six [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in both groups (18 [24%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib alone group).Interpretation Erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination could be a new first-line regimen in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Further investigation of the regimen is warranted.Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The erlotinib-bevacizumab combination as upfront therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs is associated with substantial PFS benefit over erlotinib alone (16-16.3 vs 9.7-12.4 months).
“The Erlotinib–bevacizumab combination as upfront therapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs has been associated with substantial PFS benefit in phase II/III studies over erlotinib therapy alone (16–16.3 months vs. 9.7–12.4 months) [98,99]”
In a randomized phase II study, erlotinib plus bevacizumab achieved median PFS of 16.0 months versus 9.7 months for erlotinib alone.
“In a randomized phase II study examining the role of erlotinib-bevacizumab, median PFS reached an impressive 16.0 months, compared with 9.7 months for erlotinib alone.66”
In a Japanese randomised trial of 154 EGFR-mutated patients, erlotinib plus bevacizumab improved median PFS versus erlotinib alone (16.0 versus 9.7 months, HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.79, P=0.0015).
“In a Japanese randomised trial, 154 EGFR-mutated patients were randomised to receive erlotinib and bevacizumab or erlotinib alone (75 patients in the combination arm and 77 in the erlotinib alone arm were included in the efficacy analyses) [116].Median PFS was 16.0 months (95% CI: 13.9-18.1)with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.7-11.1)with erlotinib alone (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36”
From Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2016) · cites this paper as [116]
In that trial, erlotinib plus bevacizumab produced no new safety signals; any-grade adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between arms, but grade 3 or worse adverse events were more frequent with the combination and 41% discontinued bevacizumab due to adverse events, mostly non-serious and reversible.
“No new safety signals were identified with the combination treatment, and the incidence of AEs (any grade) and SAEs were similar between the treatment arms.There was a higher frequency of grade 3 or worse AEs with the combination and a relatively high incidence of bevacizumab discontinuation due to AEs (41%); however, most of these AEs were non-serious and reversible.”
From Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2016) · cites this paper as [116]
Cites
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486 · see citing works
Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Sandler, A., Gray, R., Perry, M. C., Brahmer, J., Schiller, J. H., Dowlati, A., Lilenbaum, R., & Johnson, D. H. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061884 · Cited by 5,761 · see citing works
Sequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Self-citationScreening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer
Rosell, R., Moran, T., Queralt, C., Porta, R., Cardenal, F., Camps, C., Majem, M., Lopez-Vivanco, G., Isla, D., Provencio, M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904554 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
Wu, Y.-L., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., Feng, J., Lu, S., Huang, Y., Li, W., Hou, M., Shi, J. H., Lee, K. Y., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70604-1 · Cited by 1,978 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Novello, S., Barlesi, F., Califano, R., Cufer, T., Ekman, S., Levra, M. G., Kerr, K., Popat, S., Reck, M., Senan, S., et al. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw326 · Cited by 2,631 · see citing works
Combination therapy in combating cancer
Mokhtari, R. B., Homayouni, T. S., Baluch, N., Morgatskaya, E., Kumar, S., Das, B., & Yeger, H. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.16723 · Cited by 2,543 · see citing works
Antiangiogenesis Strategies Revisited: From Starving Tumors to Alleviating Hypoxia
Jain, R. K. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.006 · Cited by 1,589 · see citing works
Cell death-based treatment of lung adenocarcinoma
Denisenko, T. V., Budkevich, I. N., & Zhivotovsky, B. (2018) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-017-0063-y · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Tan, D. S. W., Yom, S. S., Tsao, M. S., Pass, H. I., Kelly, K., Peled, N., Yung, R. C., Wistuba, I. I., Yatabe, Y., Unger, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2016.05.008 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Rosell, R., Dafni, U., Felip, E., Curioni-Fontecedro, A., Gautschi, O., Peters, S., Massutí, B., Palmero, R., Aix, S. P., Carcereny, E., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30129-7 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Russo, A., Franchina, T., Ricciardi, G., Battaglia, A., Picciotto, M., & Adamo, V. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20061431 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Targeting EGFR in Lung Cancer: Current Standards and Developments
Díaz-Serrano, A., Gella, P., Jiménez, E., Zugazagoitia, J., & Paz-Ares Rodríguez, L. (2018) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-018-0916-4 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Girard, N. (2018) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2017-0636 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Reguart, N., & Remon, J. (2015) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon.15.15 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Liu, X., Hong, L., Nilsson, M., Hubert, S. M., Wu, S., Rinsurongkawong, W., Lewis, J., Spelman, A., Roth, J., Swisher, S., et al. (2020) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.023 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Seto, T., Kato, T., Nishio, M., Goto, K., Atagi, S., Hosomi, Y., Yamamoto, N., Hida, T., Maemondo, M., Nakagawa, K., Nagase, S., Okamoto, I., Yamanaka, T., Tajima, K., Harada, R., Fukuoka, M., & Yamamoto, N.
- Affiliations
- National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP)
- Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center (JP)
- The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP)
- NHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center (JP)
- Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital (JP)
- Wakayama Medical University (JP)
- Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
- Miyagi Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP)
- Kindai University (JP)
- Tokyo Medical University Hospital (JP)
- Kyushu University Hospital (JP)
- Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
- Izumi City General Hospital (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1236-1244
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136601558
- Semantic Scholar
- 0bb6437328976392345744b503cff593878c0c7f
- Cited by
- 750
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 63.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2014-10-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24591184)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Keywords
- erlotinib, bevacizumab, EGFR mutation, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, first-line therapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combination therapy, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment safety, anti-angiogenic therapy, advanced lung cancer, recurrent lung cancer, Japanese patients
- MeSH terms
- Bevacizumab, Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Japan, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Quinazolines, Confidence Intervals, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review