Cited by 750Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study

Seto, Takashi, Kato, Terufumi, Nishio, Makoto, Goto, Koichi, Atagi, Shinji, Hosomi, Yukio, Yamamoto, Noboru, Hida, Toyoaki +9 more·2014·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background With use of EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor monotherapy for patients with activating EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), median progression-free survival has been extended to about 12 months. Nevertheless, new strategies are needed to further extend progression-free survival and overall survival with acceptable toxicity and tolerability for this population. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab compared with erlotinib alone in patients with non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation-positive disease.Methods In this open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients from 30 centres across Japan with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease received erlotinib 150 mg/day plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or erlotinib 150 mg/day monotherapy as a first-line therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as determined by an independent review committee. Randomisation was done with a dynamic allocation method, and the analysis used a modified intention-to-treat approach, including all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had tumour assessment at least once after randomisation. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center, number JapicCTI-111390.Findings Between Feb 21, 2011, and March 5, 2012, 154 patients were enrolled. 77 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and bevacizumab and 77 to erlotinib alone, of whom 75 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 77 in the erlotinib alone group were included in the efficacy analyses. Median progression-free survival was 16·0 months (95% CI 13·9-18·1) with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9·7 months (5·7-11·1) with erlotinib alone (hazard ratio 0·54, 95% CI 0·36-0·79; log-rank test p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were rash (19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 15 [19%] patients in the erlotinib alone group), hypertension (45 [60%] vs eight [10%]), and proteinuria (six [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in both groups (18 [24%] patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 19 [25%] patients in the erlotinib alone group).Interpretation Erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination could be a new first-line regimen in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Further investigation of the regimen is warranted.Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70381-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seto, T., Kato, T., Nishio, M., Goto, K., Atagi, S., Hosomi, Y., Yamamoto, N., Hida, T., Maemondo, M., Nakagawa, K., Nagase, S., Okamoto, I., Yamanaka, T., Tajima, K., Harada, R., Fukuoka, M., & Yamamoto, N.
Affiliations
  • National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP)
  • Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center (JP)
  • The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP)
  • NHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital (JP)
  • Wakayama Medical University (JP)
  • Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
  • Miyagi Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP)
  • Kindai University (JP)
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital (JP)
  • Kyushu University Hospital (JP)
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
  • Izumi City General Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1236-1244
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136601558
Cited by
750
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 97 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 10
FWCI
63.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2014-10-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24591184)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
erlotinib, bevacizumab, EGFR mutation, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, first-line therapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combination therapy, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment safety, anti-angiogenic therapy, advanced lung cancer, recurrent lung cancer, Japanese patients
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Japan, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Quinazolines, Confidence Intervals, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review