The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND VEGF and VEGF receptor-2-mediated angiogenesis contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Ramucirumab is a recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody and VEGF receptor-2 antagonist. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib. METHODS In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial (REACH), patients were enrolled from 154 centres in 27 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had hepatocellular carcinoma with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease or stage B disease that was refractory or not amenable to locoregional therapy, had Child-Pugh A liver disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had previously received sorafenib (stopped because of progression or intolerance), and had adequate haematological and biochemical parameters. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks, plus best supportive care, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Randomisation was stratified by geographic region and cause of liver disease with a stratified permuted block method. Patients, medical staff, investigators, and the funder were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01140347. FINDINGS Between Nov 4, 2010, and April 18, 2013, 565 patients were enrolled, of whom 283 were assigned to ramucirumab and 282 were assigned to placebo. Median overall survival for the ramucirumab group was 9·2 months (95% CI 8·0-10·6) versus 7·6 months (6·0-9·3) for the placebo group (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·72-1·05]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurring in 5% or more of patients in either treatment group were ascites (13 [5%] of 277 patients treated with ramucirumab vs 11 [4%] of 276 patients treated with placebo), hypertension (34 [12%] vs ten [4%]), asthenia (14 [5%] vs five [2%]), malignant neoplasm progression (18 [6%] vs 11 [4%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration (15 [5%] vs 23 [8%]), thrombocytopenia (13 [5%] vs one [<1%]), hyperbilirubinaemia (three [1%] vs 13 [5%]), and increased blood bilirubin (five [2%] vs 14 [5%]). The most frequently reported (≥1%) treatment-emergent serious adverse event of any grade or grade 3 or more was malignant neoplasm progression. INTERPRETATION Second-line treatment with ramucirumab did not significantly improve survival over placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. No new safety signals were noted in eligible patients and the safety profile is manageable. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Co.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., Parkin, D. M., Forman, D., & Bray, F. (2015) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.29210 · Cited by 28,766
Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Llovet, J. M., Ricci, S., Mazzaferro, V., Hilgard, P., Gane, E., Blanc, J.-F., de Oliveira, A. C., Santoro, A., Raoul, J.-L., Forner, A., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0708857 · Cited by 13,097
Self-citationCheng, A.-L., Kang, Y.-K., Chen, Z., Tsao, C.-J., Qin, S., Kim, J. S., Luo, R., Feng, J., Ye, S., Yang, T.-S., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70285-7 · Cited by 5,832
Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
정, 재. (2008) · Cited by 5,586
Fuchs, C. S., Tomasek, J., Yong, C. J., Dumitru, F., Passalacqua, R., Goswami, C., Safran, H., dos Santos, L. V., Aprile, G., Ferry, D. R., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61719-5 · Cited by 2,188
Self-citationHoshida, Y., Nijman, S. M. B., Kobayashi, M., Chan, J. A., Brunet, J.-P., Chiang, D. Y., Villanueva, A., Newell, P., Ikeda, K., Hashimoto, M., et al. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-1089 · Cited by 1,238
A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study of 435 patients
(1998) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510280322 · Cited by 1,238
EpCAM and α-Fetoprotein Expression Defines Novel Prognostic Subtypes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Yamashita, T., Forgues, M., Wang, W., Kim, J. W., Ye, Q., Jia, H., Budhu, A., Zanetti, K. A., Chen, Y., Qin, L.-X., et al. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6013 · Cited by 717
HCC and angiogenesis: possible targets and future directions
Zhu, A. X., Duda, D. G., Sahani, D. V., & Jain, R. K. (2011) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.30 · Cited by 564
Self-citationSpratlin, J. L., Cohen, R. B., Eadens, M., Gore, L., Camidge, D. R., Diab, S., Leong, S., O'Bryant, C., Chow, L. Q. M., Serkova, N. J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.7537 · Cited by 549
Cited by
Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Llovet, J. M., Ricci, S., Mazzaferro, V., Hilgard, P., Gane, E., Blanc, J.-F., de Oliveira, A. C., Santoro, A., Raoul, J.-L., Forner, A., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0708857 · Cited by 13,097
Self-citationEASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
Villanueva, A. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1713263 · Cited by 4,508
Llovet, J. M., Zucman-Rossi, J., Pikarsky, E., Sangro, B., Schwartz, M., Sherman, M., & Gores, G. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.18 · Cited by 2,531
Vogel, A., Meyer, T., Sapisochin, G., Salem, R., & Saborowski, A. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01200-4 · Cited by 2,427
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, A. X., Park, J. O., Ryoo, B.-Y., Yen, C.-J., Poon, R., Pastorelli, D., Blanc, J.-F., Chung, H. C., Baron, A. D., Pfiffer, T. E. F., Okusaka, T., Kubackova, K., Trojan, J., Sastre, J., Chau, I., Chang, S.-C., Abada, P. B., Yang, L., Schwartz, J. D., & Kudo, M.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 859-870
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1828082159
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 36.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00050-9
- The paper
- Zhu, A. X., Park, J. O., Ryoo, B.-Y., Yen, C.-J., Poon, R., Pastorelli, D., Blanc, J.-F., Chung, H. C., Baron, A. D., Pfiffer, T. E. F., Okusaka, T., Kubackova, K., Trojan, J., Sastre, J., Chau, I., Chang, S.-C., Abada, P. B., Yang, L., Schwartz, J. D., & Kudo, M. (2015). Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00050-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.