Cited by 5,832Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHepatitis B Virus Studies

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Cheng, Ann-Lii, Kang, Yoon-Koo, Chen, Zhendong, Tsao, Chao-Jung, Qin, Shukui, Kim, Jun Suk, Luo, Rongcheng, Feng, Jifeng +13 more·2009·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background Most cases of hepatocellular carcinoma occur in the Asia-Pacific region, where chronic hepatitis B infection is an important aetiological factor. Assessing the efficacy and safety of new therapeutic options in an Asia-Pacific population is thus important. We did a multinational phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients from the Asia-Pacific region with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods Between Sept 20, 2005, and Jan 31, 2007, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic therapy and had Child-Pugh liver function class A, were randomly assigned to receive either oral sorafenib (400 mg) or placebo twice daily in 6-week cycles, with efficacy measured at the end of each 6-week period. Eligible patients were stratified by the presence or absence of macroscopic vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread (or both), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and geographical region. Randomisation was done centrally and in a 2:1 ratio by means of an interactive voice-response system. There was no predefined primary endpoint; overall survival, time to progression (TTP), time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were assessed. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00492752.Findings 271 patients from 23 centres in China, South Korea, and Taiwan were enrolled in the study. Of these, 226 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n=150) or to the placebo group (n=76). Median overall survival was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.56-7.56) in patients treated with sorafenib, compared with 4.2 months (3.75-5.46) in those who received placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68 [95% CI 0.50-0.93]; p=0.014). Median TTP was 2.8 months (2.63-3.58) in the sorafenib group compared with 1.4 months (1.35-1.55) in the placebo group (HR 0.57 [0.42-0.79]; p=0.0005). The most frequently reported grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events in the 149 assessable patients treated with sorafenib were hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR; 16 patients [10.7%]), diarrhoea (nine patients [6.0%]), and fatigue (five patients [3.4%]). The most common adverse events resulting in dose reductions were HFSR (17 patients [11.4%]) and diarrhoea (11 patients [7.4%]); these adverse events rarely led to discontinuation.Interpretation Sorafenib is effective for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in patients from the Asia-Pacific region, and is well tolerated. Taken together with data from the Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomised Protocol (SHARP) trial, sorafenib seems to be an appropriate option for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70285-7

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, A.-L., Kang, Y.-K., Chen, Z., Tsao, C.-J., Qin, S., Kim, J. S., Luo, R., Feng, J., Ye, S., Yang, T.-S., Xu, J., Sun, Y., Liang, H., Liu, J., Wang, J., Tak, W. Y., Pan, H., Burock, K., Zou, J., Voliotis, D., & Guan, Z.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
  • Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
  • 81th Hospital of PLA (CN)
  • Korea University Guro Hospital (KR)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
  • Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN)
  • Shanghai Changzheng Hospital (CN)
  • Kyungpook National University Hospital (KR)
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
  • Bayer (China) (CN)
  • Bayer (United States) (US)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Ann-Lii
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
25-34
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994193851
Cited by
5,832
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 242 · 2024: 300 · 2023: 380 · 2022: 413 · 2021: 480 · 2020: 470 · 2019: 390 · 2018: 384 · 2017: 394 · 2016: 351 · 2015: 375 · 2014: 376 · 2013: 356 · 2012: 293
FWCI
129.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bayer HealthCare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Keywords
sorafenib, hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced liver cancer, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, overall survival, time to progression, disease control rate, safety, chronic hepatitis B, liver metastasis, China, South Korea, Taiwan, macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread, ECOG performance status
MeSH terms
Sorafenib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzenesulfonates, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Double-Blind Method, Female, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Niacinamide, Phenylurea Compounds, Pyridines, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review