Cited by 242Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGenital Health and DiseaseReproductive tract infections research

Immunogenicity and HPV infection after one, two, and three doses of quadrivalent HPV vaccine in girls in India: a multicentre prospective cohort study

Open access
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy, Prabhu, Priya Ramesh, Pawlita, Michael, Gheit, Tarik, Bhatla, Neerja, Muwonge, Richard, Nene, Bhagwan M, Esmy, Pulikottil Okuru +31 more·2016·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increase in worldwide HPV vaccination could be facilitated if fewer than three doses of vaccine are as effective as three doses. We originally aimed to compare the immunogenicity and frequency of persistent infection and cervical precancerous lesions caused by vaccine-targeted HPV after vaccination with two doses of quadrivalent vaccine on days 1 and 180 or later, with three doses on days 1, 60, and 180 or later, in a cluster-randomised trial. Suspension of the recruitment and vaccination due to events unrelated to our study meant that some enrolled girls could not be vaccinated and some vaccinated girls received fewer than the planned number of vaccinations by default. As a result, we re-analysed our data as an observational cohort study. METHODS: Our study was designed to be done in nine locations (188 clusters) in India. Participants were unmarried girls aged 10-18 years vaccinated in four cohorts: girls who received three doses of vaccine on days 1, 60, and 180 or later, two doses on days 1 and 180 or later, two doses on days 1 and 60 by default, and one dose by default. The primary outcomes were immunogenicity in terms of L1 genotype-specific binding antibody titres, neutralising antibody titres, and antibody avidity after vaccination for the vaccine-targeted HPV types 16, 18, 6, and 11 and incident and persistent infections with these HPVs. Analysis was per actual number of vaccine doses received. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN98283094; and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00923702. FINDINGS: Vaccination of eligible girls was initiated on Sept 1, 2009, and continued until April 8, 2010. Of 21 258 eligible girls identified at 188 clusters, 17 729 girls were recruited from 178 clusters before suspension. 4348 (25%) girls received three doses, 4979 (28%) received two doses on days 1 and 180 or later, 3452 (19%) received two doses at days 1 and 60, and 4950 (28%) received one dose. Immune response in the two-dose HPV vaccine group was non-inferior to the three-dose group (median fluorescence intensity ratio for HPV 16 1·12 [95% CI 1·02-1·23] and for HPV 18 1·04 [0·92-1·19]) at 7 months, but was inferior in the two-dose default (0·33 [0·29-0·38] for HPV 16 and 0·51 [0·43-0·59] for HPV 18) and one-dose default (0·09 [0·08-0·11] for HPV 16 and 0·12 [0·10-0·14] for HPV 18) groups at 18 months. The geometric mean avidity indices after fewer than three doses by design or default were non-inferior to those after three doses of vaccine. Fewer than three doses by design and default induced detectable concentrations of neutralising antibodies to all four vaccine-targeted HPV types, but at much lower concentration after one dose. Cervical samples from 2649 participants were tested and the frequency of incident HPV 16, 18, 6, and 11 infections was similar irrespective of the number of vaccine doses received. The testing of at least two samples from 838 participants showed that there was no persistent HPV 16 or 18 infections in any study group at a median follow-up of 4·7 years (IQR 4·2-5·1). INTERPRETATION: Despite the limitations imposed by the suspension of the HPV vaccination, our findings lend support to the WHO recommendation of two doses, at least 6 months apart, for routine vaccination of young girls. The short-term protection afforded by one dose of HPV vaccine against persistent infection with HPV 16, 18, 6, and 11 is similar to that afforded by two or three doses of vaccine and merits further assessment. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00414-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to lack of Indian specific data on incidence of HPV infection, age specific HPV incidence rates were derived based on data of HPV infection in a vaccinated cohort of adolescent girls.

    “Similarly, due to lack of Indian specific data on incidence of HPV infection, age specific HPV incidence rates were derived based on data of HPV infection in a vaccinated cohort of adolescent girls. [28]”
  • The incidence rate of HPV infection among unvaccinated 20-25-year-old women was computed as 11.6%.

    “Using the reported annual incidence rate of 0.8% for the HPV infection (HPV 16 and 18) among 20–25 year old immunized women with 2 doses of HPV vaccine [28] and vaccine efficacy of 93%, [29] we computed the incidence rate of HPV infection as 11.6% among unvaccinated cohort of the same age group.”

    From Cost effectiveness of strategies for cervical cancer prevention in India (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

    The citing sentence says its authors computed 11.6% using figures cited separately; it does not attribute that calculation to this paper. The paper’s Results report HPV infections in vaccinated groups, while its Discussion mentions a 3–9% frequency of HPV 16/18 infection in unvaccinated young women. Neither passage gives an 11.6% incidence rate for unvaccinated women aged 20–25 (pages unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Rural households are more hesitant about HPV vaccination.

    “Family disapproval, particularly in patriarchal or conservative settings, often resulted in refusal to vaccinate, with rural households being more hesitant24,45.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Methods (Study design and participants; Procedures) describe obtaining parental consent, and the Results report how many eligible girls were vaccinated. Neither those passages nor the Discussion addresses whether rural households were more hesitant about HPV vaccination. Searches for rural refusal and rural–urban differences in consent found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Schiller JT Castellsague X Garland SM A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines Vaccine 30 suppl 5 2012 F123 F138 23199956 PMC4636904
  2. [2]Bosch FX Broker TR Forman D Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases Vaccine 31 suppl 5 2013 F1 31 24331745
  3. [3]Erickson BK Landers EE Huh WK Update on vaccination clinical trials for HPV-related disease Clin Ther 36 2014 8 16 24417781
  4. [6]Block SL Nolan T Sattler C Comparison of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in male and female adolescents and young adult women Pediatrics 118 2006 2135 2145 17079588
  5. [7]Pedersen C Petaja T Strauss G Immunization of early adolescent females with human papillomavirus type 16 and 18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine containing AS04 adjuvant J Adolesc Health 40 2007 564 571 17531764
  6. [8]Waterboer T Sehr P Michael KM Multiplex human papillomavirus serology based on in situ-purified glutathione s-transferase fusion proteins Clin Chem 51 2005 1845 1853 16099939
  7. [9]Sehr P Rubio I Seitz H High-throughput pseudovirion-based neutralization assay for analysis of natural and vaccine-induced antibodies against human papillomaviruses PLoS One 8 2013 e75677 24124504 PMC3790823
  8. [10]Schmitt M Dondog B Waterboer T Pawlita M Tommasino M Gheit T Abundance of multiple high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections found in cervical cells analyzed by use of an ultrasensitive HPV genotyping assay J Clin Microbiol 48 2010 143 149 19864475 PMC2812266
  9. [11]Gheit T Landi S Gemignani F Development of a sensitive and specific assay combining multiplex PCR and DNA microarray primer extension to detect high-risk mucosal human papillomavirus types J Clin Microbiol 44 2006 2025 2031 16757593 PMC1489390
  10. [12]Reisinger KS Block SL Lazcano-Ponce E Safety and persistent immunogenicity of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, 18 L1 virus-like particle vaccine in preadolescents and adolescents: a randomized controlled trial Pediatr Infect Dis J 26 2007 201 209 17484215
  11. [13]Neuzil KM Canh DG Thiem VD Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of alternative schedules of HPV vaccine in Vietnam: a cluster randomized noninferiority trial JAMA 305 2011 1424 1431 21486975
  12. [14]Wang WW Mehrotra DV Chan IS Heyse JF Statistical considerations for noninferiority/equivalence trials in vaccine development J Biopharm Stat 16 2006 429 441 16892905
  13. [15]Sankaranarayanan R Bhatla N Gravitt PE Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer prevention in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal Vaccine 26 suppl 12 2008 M43 M52 18945413
  14. [17]Santhya KG Ram U Acharya R Pre-marital sexual relations among youth in India: findings from the Youth in India, Situations and Needs Study. XXVI International Union for the Scientific Study Population Conference; Marrakech, Morocco; Sept 27, to Oct 2, 2009 http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/papers/92480 (accessed Sept 16, 2015).
  15. [18]Kelkar DS Patwardhan M Joshi VD Prevalence and causalities of tobacco consumption (TC) among adolescents: a cross sectional study at Pune J Assoc Physicians India 61 2013 174 178 24475679
  16. [19]Madaan M Agrawal S Puri M Meena J Kaur H Trivedi SS Health profile of urban adolescent girls from India Int J Adolesc Med Health 26 2014 233 237 24535298
  17. [20]Datta P Bhatla N Dar L Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection among young women in North India Cancer Epidemiol 34 2010 157 161 20153993
  18. [21]Datta P Bhatla N Pandey RM Type-specific incidence and persistence of HPV infection among young women: a prospective study in North India Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13 2012 1019 1024 22631631
  19. [22]Dutta S Begum R Mazumder ID Prevalence of human papillomavirus in women without cervical cancer: a population-based study in eastern India Int J Gynecol Pathol 31 2012 178 183 22317877
  20. [23]Sharma K Kathait A Jain A Higher prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in adolescent and young adult girls belonging to different Indian tribes with varied socio-sexual lifestyle PLoS One 10 2015 e0125693 25954813 PMC4425665
  21. [24]Joura EA Kjaer SK Wheeler CM HPV antibody levels and clinical efficacy following administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent HPV vaccine Vaccine 26 2008 6844 6851 18930097
  22. [25]Dobson SR McNeil S Dionne M Immunogenicity of 2 doses of HPV vaccine in younger adolescents vs 3 doses in young women: a randomized clinical trial JAMA 309 2013 1793 1802 23632723
  23. [26]Romanowski B Schwarz TF Ferguson LM Immune response to the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine administered as a 2-dose or 3-dose schedule up to 4 years after vaccination: results from a randomized study Hum Vaccin Immunother 10 2014 1155 1165 24576907 PMC4896558
  24. [27]Safaeian M Porras C Pan Y Durable antibody responses following one dose of the bivalent human papillomavirus L1 virus-like particle vaccine in the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 6 2013 1242 1250 24189371 PMC7605443
  25. [28]Lazcano-Ponce E Stanley M Munoz N Overcoming barriers to HPV vaccination: non-inferiority of antibody response to human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine in adolescents vaccinated with a two-dose vs. a three-dose schedule at 21 months Vaccine 32 2014 725 732 24355090
  26. [29]Kreimer AR Rodriguez AC Hildesheim A Proof-of-principle evaluation of the efficacy of fewer than three doses of a bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine J Natl Cancer Inst 103 2011 1444 1451 21908768 PMC3186781
  27. [30]Kreimer AR Struyf F Del Rosario-Raymundo MR for the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial and the PATRICIA study groups Efficacy of fewer than three doses of an HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine: combined analysis of data from the Costa Rica Vaccine and PATRICIA trials Lancet Oncol 16 2015 775 786 26071347 PMC4498478
  28. [31]Breitburd F Kirnbauer R Hubbert NL Immunization with viruslike particles from cottontail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) can protect against experimental CRPV infection J Virol 69 1995 3959 3963 7745754 PMC189126
  29. [32]Day PM Kines RC Thompson CD In vivo mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against HPV infection Cell Host Microbe 8 2010 260 270 20833377 PMC2939057
  30. [33]Schiller JT Lowy DR Raising expectations for subunit vaccine J Infect Dis 211 2015 1373 1375 25420478 PMC4400525
  31. [34]Bachmann MF Jennings GT Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns Nat Rev Immunol 10 2010 787 796 20948547
  32. [35]Herweijer E Leval A Ploner A Association of varying number of doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine with incidence of condyloma JAMA 311 2014 597 603 24519299
  33. [36]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2012 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62 2013 685 693 23985496 PMC4604993
  34. [37]Bertaut A Chavanet P Aho S Astruc K Douvier S Fournel I HPV vaccination coverage in French girls attending middle and high schools: a declarative cross sectional study in the department of Cote d'Or Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170 2013 526 532 23953913

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sankaranarayanan, R., Prabhu, P. R., Pawlita, M., Gheit, T., Bhatla, N., Muwonge, R., Nene, B. M., Esmy, P. O., Joshi, S., Poli, U. R. R., Jivarajani, P., Verma, Y., Zomawia, E., Siddiqi, M., Shastri, S. S., Jayant, K., Malvi, S. G., Lucas, E., Michel, A., Butt, J., Vijayamma, J. M. B., Sankaran, S., Kannan, T. P. R. A., Varghese, R., Divate, U., Thomas, S., Joshi, G., Willhauck-Fleckenstein, M., Waterboer, T., Müller, M., Sehr, P., Hingmire, S., Kriplani, A., Mishra, G., Pimple, S., Jadhav, R., Sauvaget, C., Tommasino, M., & Pillai, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology (IN)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Nargis Dutt Memorial Cancer Hospital (IN)
  • Jehangir Hospital (IN)
  • Cancer Foundation of India (IN)
  • Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
  • Gujarat Cancer & Research Institute (IN)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
Corresponding author
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
67-77
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187298330
Cited by
242
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
23.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • World Health Organization
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • European Commission (282562, FP7‐HEALTH‐2011)
  • FP7 Health (FP7-HEALTH-2011-282562)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
quadrivalent HPV vaccine, HPV vaccination, immunogenicity, vaccine dose number, two-dose schedule, persistent HPV infection, cervical precancerous lesions, HPV16, HPV 18, HPV 6, HPV 11, neutralizing antibodies, antibody avidity, adolescent girls, India, vaccine safety, adverse events, cervical cancer prevention
MeSH terms
Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18, Adolescent, Antibodies, Viral, Cervix Uteri, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, India, Prospective Studies, Vaccination, Incidence, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 11, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Early Termination of Clinical Trials, Vaccine Potency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review