The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pregnancy after chemotherapy in male and female survivors of childhood cancer treated between 1970 and 1999: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort
Open accessAbstract
Summary Background The effect of many contemporary chemotherapeutic drugs on pregnancy and livebirth is not well established. We aimed to establish the effects of these drugs on pregnancy in male and female survivors of childhood cancer not exposed to pelvic or cranial radiotherapy. Methods We used data from a subset of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort, which followed 5-year survivors of the most common types of childhood cancer who were diagnosed before age 21 years and treated at 27 institutions in the USA and Canada between 1970 and 1999. We extracted doses of 14 alkylating and similar DNA interstrand crosslinking drugs from medical records. We used sex-specific Cox models to establish the independent effects of each drug and the cumulative cyclophosphamide equivalent dose of all drugs in relation to pregnancies and livebirths occurring between ages 15 years and 44 years. We included siblings of survivors as a comparison group. Findings We included 10 938 survivors and 3949 siblings. After a median follow-up of 8 years (IQR 4–12) from cohort entry or at age 15 years, whichever was later, 4149 (38%) survivors reported having or siring a pregnancy, of whom 3453 (83%) individuals reported at least one livebirth. After a median follow-up of 10 years (IQR 6–15), 2445 (62%) siblings reported having or siring a pregnancy, of whom 2201 (90%) individuals reported at least one livebirth. In multivariable analysis, survivors had a decreased likelihood of siring or having a pregnancy versus siblings (male survivors: hazard ratio [HR] 0·63, 95% CI 0·58–0·68; p<0·0001; female survivors: 0·87, 0·81–0·94; p<0·0001) or of having a livebirth (male survivors: 0·63, 0·58–0·69; p<0·0001; female survivors: 0·82, 0·76–0·89; p<0·0001). In male survivors, reduced likelihood of pregnancy was associated with upper tertile doses of cyclophosphamide (HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·51–0·71; p<0·0001), ifosfamide (0·42, 0·23–0·79; p=0·0069), procarbazine (0·30, 0·20–0·46; p<0·0001) and cisplatin (0·56, 0·39–0·82; p=0·0023). Cyclophosphamide equivalent dose in male survivors was significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of siring a pregnancy (per 5000 mg/m2 increments: HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·79–0·86; p<0·0001). However, in female survivors, only busulfan (<450 mg/m2 HR 0·22, 95% CI 0·06–0·79; p=0·020; ≥450 mg/m2 0·14, 0·03–0·55; p=0·0051) and doses of lomustine equal to or greater than 411 mg/m2 (0·41, 0·17–0·98; p=0·046) were significantly associated with reduced pregnancy; cyclophosphamide equivalent dose was associated with risk only at the highest doses in analyses categorised by quartile (upper quartile vs no exposure: HR 0·85, 95% CI 0·74–0·98; p=0·023). Results for livebirth were similar to those for pregnancy. Interpretation Greater doses of contemporary alkylating drugs and cisplatin were associated with a decreased likelihood of siring a pregnancy in male survivors of childhood cancer. However, our findings should provide reassurance to most female survivors treated with chemotherapy without radiotherapy to the pelvis or brain, given that chemotherapy-specific effects on pregnancy were generally few. Nevertheless, consideration of fertility preservation before cancer treatment remains important to maximise the reproductive potential of all adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer. Funding National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the American Lebanese–Syrian Associated Charities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model
Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 · Cited by 8,674
Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. A., & May, S. J. (2008) · Cited by 3,030
Incidence of early loss of pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Weinberg, C. R., O'Connor, J. F., Baird, D. D., Schlatterer, J. P., Canfield, R. E., Armstrong, E. G., & Nisula, B. C. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198807283190401 · Cited by 2,354
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys.
Lynn, P., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348774 · Cited by 2,329
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Feinstein, A. R., & Holford, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8 · Cited by 2,154
Sanders, J., Hawley, J., Levy, W., Gooley, T., Buckner, C., Deeg, H., Doney, K., Storb, R., Sullivan, K., Witherspoon, R., et al. (1996) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v87.7.3045.bloodjournal8773045 · Cited by 722
Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., Curtin, S. C., & Matthews, T. J. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 719
Robison, L. L., Armstrong, G. T., Boice, J. D., Chow, E. J., Davies, S. M., Donaldson, S. S., Green, D. M., Hammond, S., Meadows, A. T., Mertens, A. C., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.22.3339 · Cited by 669
Self-citationFertility of Female Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
Green, D. M., Kawashima, T., Stovall, M., Leisenring, W., Sklar, C. A., Mertens, A. C., Donaldson, S. S., Byrne, J., & Robison, L. L. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.20.1541 · Cited by 575
Self-citation
Cited by
Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection
Spears, N., Lopes, F., Stefansdottir, A., Rossi, V, De Felici, M., Anderson, R. A., & Klinger, F. G. (2019) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz027 · Cited by 657
Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Coccia, P. F., Pappo, A. S., Beaupin, L., Borges, V. F., Borinstein, S. C., Chugh, R., Dinner, S., Folbrecht, J., Frazier, A. L., Goldsby, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0001 · Cited by 295
Self-citationAdolescent and young adult oncology—past, present, and future
Close, A. G., Dreyzin, A., Miller, K. D., Seynnaeve, B. K. N., & Rapkin, L. B. (2019) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21585 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Chow, E. J., Stratton, K. L., Leisenring, W. M., Oeffinger, K. C., Sklar, C. A., Donaldson, S. S., Ginsberg, J. P., Kenney, L. B., Levine, J. M., Robison, L. L., Shnorhavorian, M., Stovall, M., Armstrong, G. T., & Green, D. M.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-576
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2303955852
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 30.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pregnancy after chemotherapy in male and female survivors of childhood cancer treated between 1970 and 1999: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00086-3
- The paper
- Chow, E. J., Stratton, K. L., Leisenring, W. M., Oeffinger, K. C., Sklar, C. A., Donaldson, S. S., Ginsberg, J. P., Kenney, L. B., Levine, J. M., Robison, L. L., Shnorhavorian, M., Stovall, M., Armstrong, G. T., & Green, D. M. (2016). Pregnancy after chemotherapy in male and female survivors of childhood cancer treated between 1970 and 1999: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00086-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.