Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma with adoptive transfer of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: a single-centre, two-stage, single-arm, phase 2 study

Open access
Chandran, Smita S, Somerville, Robert P T, Yang, James C, Sherry, Richard M, Klebanoff, Christopher A, Goff, Stephanie L, Wunderlich, John R, Danforth, David N, Zlott, Daniel, Paria, Biman C, Sabesan, Arvind C, Srivastava, Abhishek K, Xi, Liqiang, Pham, Trinh H, Raffeld, Mark, White, Donald E, Toomey, Mary Ann, Rosenberg, Steven A, Kammula, Udai S·2017·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background Uveal melanoma is a rare tumor with no established treatments once metastases develop. Although a variety of immune based therapies have demonstrated efficacy in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, their use in ocular variants has been disappointing. Recently, adoptive T cell therapy has shown salvage responses in multiple refractory solid tumors. Thus, we sought to determine if adoptive transfer of autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) could mediate regression of metastatic uveal melanoma. Methods In this ongoing single-center, two-stage phase 2, single-arm trial, patients with histologically confirmed metastatic ocular melanoma (aged ≥ 16 years) were enrolled. Key eligibility criteria were an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, progressive metastatic disease, and adequate hematological, renal, and hepatic function. Metastasectomy operations were performed to procure tumor tissue to generate autologous TIL cultures, which then underwent large scale ex vivo expansion. Patients were treated with lymphodepleting conditioning chemotherapy followed by intravenous infusion of autologous TIL and high-dose interleukin-2. The primary end-point was objective tumor response in evaluable patients per protocol using Response to Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.0. An interim analysis of this ongoing trial is currently being reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01814046. Findings From the completed first stage and ongoing expansion stage of this trial, a total of twenty-one consecutive metastatic uveal melanoma patients were enrolled and received TIL therapy. Seven of 20 evaluable patients demonstrated objective tumor regression (35%; 95% CI: 16%-59%). Among the responders, six patients achieved partial response (PR), two of which are ongoing and have not reached maximum response. One patient achieved complete response (CR) of numerous hepatic metastases currently ongoing at 21 months post therapy. Three of the responders were refractory to prior immune checkpoint blockade. Common grade 3 or more toxic effects were related to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy regimen and included lymphopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia (21 [100%] of patients for each toxicity); anemia (14 [67%] of patients); infection (6 [29%] of patients). There was one treatment-related mortality secondary to sepsis induced multi-organ failure. Interpretation To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the ability of adoptive transfer of autologous TIL to mediate objective tumor regression in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. These initial results challenge the belief that metastatic uveal melanoma is immunotherapy resistant and support the further investigation of immune based therapies for this cancer. Refinement of this T cell therapy is critical to improve the frequency of clinical responses and the general applicability of this treatment modality. This research was fully supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCI, Center for Cancer Research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30251-6

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Chandran, S. S., Somerville, R. P. T., Yang, J. C., Sherry, R. M., Klebanoff, C. A., Goff, S. L., Wunderlich, J. R., Danforth, D. N., Zlott, D., Paria, B. C., Sabesan, A. C., Srivastava, A. K., Xi, L., Pham, T. H., Raffeld, M., White, D. E., Toomey, M. A., Rosenberg, S. A., & Kammula, U. S.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
792-802
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604931745
Cited by
292
References
32
FWCI
25.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma with adoptive transfer of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: a single-centre, two-stage, single-arm, phase 2 study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30251-6
The paper
Chandran, S. S., Somerville, R. P. T., Yang, J. C., Sherry, R. M., Klebanoff, C. A., Goff, S. L., Wunderlich, J. R., Danforth, D. N., Zlott, D., Paria, B. C., Sabesan, A. C., Srivastava, A. K., Xi, L., Pham, T. H., Raffeld, M., White, D. E., Toomey, M. A., Rosenberg, S. A., & Kammula, U. S. (2017). Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma with adoptive transfer of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes: a single-centre, two-stage, single-arm, phase 2 study. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30251-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.