Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
Abstract
Background Dacomitinib is a second-generation, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We compared its efficacy and safety with that of the reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods In this international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (ARCHER 1050), we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years or ≥20 years in Japan and South Korea) with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC and one EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or Leu858Arg) at 71 academic medical centres and university hospitals in seven countries or special administrative regions. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive oral dacomitinib 45 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) or oral gefitinib 250 mg/day (in 28-day cycles) until disease progression or another discontinuation criterion was met. Randomisation, stratified by race and EGFR mutation type, was done with a computer-generated random code assigned by a central interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by masked independent review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01774721, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients.Findings Between May 9, 2013, and March 20, 2015, 452 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive dacomitinib (n=227) or gefitinib (n=225). Median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 20·3-23·9). Median progression-free survival according to masked independent review was 14·7 months (95% CI 11·1-16·6) in the dacomitinib group and 9·2 months (9·1-11·0) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio 0·59, 95% CI 0·47-0·74; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dermatitis acneiform (31 [14%] of 227 patients given dacomitinib vs none of 224 patients given gefitinib), diarrhoea (19 [8%] vs two [1%]), and raised alanine aminotransferase levels (two [1%] vs 19 [8%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 21 (9%) patients given dacomitinib and in ten (4%) patients given gefitinib. Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the dacomitinib group (one related to untreated diarrhoea and one to untreated cholelithases/liver disease) and one in the gefitinib group (related to sigmoid colon diverticulitis/rupture complicated by pneumonia).Interpretation Dacomitinib significantly improved progression-free survival over gefitinib in first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC and should be considered as a new treatment option for this population.Funding SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group and Pfizer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In head-to-head trials, both afatinib and dacomitinib have shown significantly improved PFS versus gefitinib.
“both afatinib and dacomitinib have shown significantly improved PFS versus gefitinib.”
From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Patients with brain metastases have been excluded from clinical trials, limiting generalizability of trial outcomes to clinical practice.
“However, patients with brain metastases have been excluded from clinical trials.41 This is of particular significance as it limits the ability to generalize the outcomes of such clinical trials to patients in the clinic.”
From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
The second- and third-generation TKIs have shown significantly longer PFS compared with first-generation TKIs, and osimertinib has shown superior OS compared with first-generation TKIs.
“The second- and third-generation TKIs have shown significantly longer PFS compared with first-generation TKIs, and the third-generation TKI, osimertinib, has shown superior OS compared with first-generation TKIs.”
From Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
Dacomitinib was found to be more promising for progression-free survival compared to gefitinib in a randomized, phase III clinical trial (ARCHER 1050); however, more severe adverse reactions were observed.
“In addition, dacomitinib was found to be more promising for progression-free survival compared to gefitinib in a randomized, phase III clinical trial (ARCHER 1050); however, more severe adverse reactions were observed.130”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [130]
As a first-line agent in EGFR mutation-sensitive NSCLC, dacomitinib has been demonstrated by many clinical trials to extend overall survival and show significant advantages over first-generation EGFR TKIs.
“As a first-line agent in EGFR mutation-sensitive NSCLC, dacomitinib has been demonstrated by many clinical trials to extend overall survival and show significant advantages over first-generation EGFR TKIs.127,130”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [130]
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005 · see citing works
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486 · see citing works
<i>EGFR</i> Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368 · see citing works
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
Self-citationSequist, L. V., Yang, J. C.-H., Yamamoto, N., O'Byrne, K., Hirsh, V., Mok, T., Geater, S. L., Orlov, S., Tsai, C.-M., Boyer, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
Self-citationPartial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model
SCHOENFELD, D. (1982) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/69.1.239 · Cited by 3,111 · see citing works
Wu, Y.-L., Zhou, C., Hu, C.-P., Feng, J., Lu, S., Huang, Y., Li, W., Hou, M., Shi, J. H., Lee, K. Y., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70604-1 · Cited by 1,978 · see citing works
Self-citationPark, K., Tan, E.-H., O'Byrne, K., Zhang, L., Boyer, M., Mok, T., Hirsh, V., Yang, J. C.-H., Lee, K. H., Lu, S., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30033-x · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Self-citationSolca, F., Dahl, G., Zoephel, A., Bader, G., Sanderson, M., Klein, C., Kraemer, O., Himmelsbach, F., Haaksma, E., & Adolf, G. R. (2012) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.112.197756 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osimertinib in Untreated <i>EGFR</i> -Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Soria, J.-C., Ohe, Y., Vansteenkiste, J., Reungwetwattana, T., Chewaskulyong, B., Lee, K. H., Dechaphunkul, A., Imamura, F., Nogami, N., Kurata, T., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1713137 · Cited by 5,508 · see citing works
Self-citationThe biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer
Herbst, R. S., Morgensztern, D., & Boshoff, C. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25183 · Cited by 4,891 · see citing works
Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors
Roskoski, R. (2019) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.03.006 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials
Xie, X., Yu, T., Li, X., Zhang, N., Foster, L. J., Peng, C., Huang, W., & He, G. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01589-z · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Wang, M., Yang, J. C.-H., Mitchell, P. L., Fang, J., Camidge, D. R., Nian, W., Chiu, C.-H., Zhou, J., Zhao, Y., Su, W.-C., et al. (2022) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1615 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationHarnessing the predictive power of preclinical models for oncology drug development
Honkala, A., Malhotra, S. V., Kummar, S., & Junttila, M. R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00301-6 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings
Harvey, R. D., Adams, V. R., Beardslee, T., & Medina, P. (2020) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155220931926 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Targeting EGFR in Lung Cancer: Current Standards and Developments
Díaz-Serrano, A., Gella, P., Jiménez, E., Zugazagoitia, J., & Paz-Ares Rodríguez, L. (2018) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-018-0916-4 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Girard, N. (2018) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2017-0636 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
PROTAC therapy as a new targeted therapy for lung cancer
Li, J. W., Zheng, G., Kaye, F. J., & Wu, L. (2023) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.11.011 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Hochmair, M. J., Morabito, A., Hao, D., Yang, C.-T., Soo, R. A., Yang, J. C.-H., Gucalp, R., Halmos, B., Wang, L., Märten, A., et al. (2019) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2019-0346 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Shi, Y., Wu, L., Ji, Y., Chen, G., Li, B., Bi, M., Yang, R., Miao, L., Zhang, G., Gao, H., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00121-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Zheng, J., Shen, L., Jiang, N., Zhu, Y., Wu, L., Cao, H., Sun, W., Zhou, J., & Zhou, J. (2020) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2020.07.001 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wu, Y.-L., Cheng, Y., Zhou, X., Lee, K. H., Nakagawa, K., Niho, S., Tsuji, F., Linke, R., Rosell, R., Corral, J., Migliorino, M. R., Pluzanski, A., Sbar, E. I., Wang, T., White, J. L., Nadanaciva, S., Sandin, R., & Mok, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong General Hospital (CN)
- Jilin Province Tumor Hospital (CN)
- Army Medical University (CN)
- Chungbuk National University (KR)
- Kindai University Hospital (JP)
- National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
- Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES)
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini (IT)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Pfizer (Sweden) (SE)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Yi-Long
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1454-1466
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2760639821
- Cited by
- 1,216
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 89.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- BioClinica
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
- Keywords
- dacomitinib, gefitinib, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, first-line therapy, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, exon 19 deletion, progression-free survival, treatment safety, adverse events, EGFR mutation status, treatment discontinuation
- MeSH terms
- Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prognosis, Quinazolines, Confidence Intervals, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, Genes, erbB-1, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Quinazolinones, Kaplan-Meier Estimate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review