Cited by 16Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Efficacy and safety of limertinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR-sensitising mutation: a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial

Open access
Shi, Yuankai, Wu, Lin, Ji, Yinghua, Chen, Gongyan, Li, Baolan, Bi, Minghong, Yang, Runxiang, Miao, Liyun +46 more·2025·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Background Limertinib is a new third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study aimed to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of limertinib versus gefitinib as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR-sensitising mutation.Methods This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial was done at 56 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR-sensitising mutation (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation) detected in tumour tissue samples using the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test at a central laboratory. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral limertinib 80 mg twice a day and gefitinib-matching placebo 250 mg once a day or oral gefitinib 250 mg once a day plus limertinib-matching placebo 80 mg twice a day in 21-day cycles, until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria was met. Random assignment was stratified according to EGFR mutation type (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation) and CNS metastasis (yes or no) using permuted blocks (block size four) through an interactive web-based response system. The primary endpoint was independent central review (ICR)-assessed progression-free survival. All enrolled patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the full analysis set for efficacy analysis. All enrolled patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and one safety assessment were included in the safety set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04143607, and follow-up is ongoing.Findings Between June 30, 2021, and Sept 22, 2022, 337 patients were enrolled and 168 were randomly assigned to the limertinib group and 169 to the gefitinib group. Patients' median age was 63 years (34-82). 214 (64%) of 337 patients were female and 123 (36%) were male. The median masked ICR-assessed progression-free survival was 20·7 months (95% CI 15·2-22·1) in the limertinib group and 9·7 months (95% CI 8·3-11·1) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·44 [95% CI 0·34-0·58]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 42 (25%) of 168 patients in the limertinib group and 42 (25%) of 169 patients in the gefitinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in nine (5%) patients and 17 (10%) patients in each group, respectively. Six (4%) patients in the limertinib group died due to adverse events, all of which were considered possibly unrelated to the study drug by investigators. In the gefitinib group, seven (4%) patients died due to adverse events, with three (2%) of those deaths judged as possibly related to the study drug by investigators. Three treatment-related deaths in the gefitinib group were recorded (one case related to pneumonia and two with cause of death unknown).Interpretation Limertinib showed superior efficacy compared with gefitinib and a manageable safety profile for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitising mutation and should be considered as another first-line treatment option for this patient population.Funding Jiangsu Aosaikang Pharmaceutical.Translation For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(25)00121-3

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thai AA, Solomon BJ, Sequist LV, Gainor JF, Heist RS. Lung cancer. Lancet 2021; 398: 535-54.

Authors
Shi, Y., Wu, L., Ji, Y., Chen, G., Li, B., Bi, M., Yang, R., Miao, L., Zhang, G., Gao, H., Sun, L., Zhang, M., Cang, S., Sun, M., Yao, W., Pan, Z., Cui, J., Xiao, Y., Wang, Q., Song, Y., Shi, M., Wang, D., Li, Z., Liu, H., Dong, X., Wang, X., Fang, J., Xie, Y., Zang, A., Chen, M., Song, X., Wang, K., Chen, B., Chen, Q., Wang, H., Sun, P., Li, W., Zhang, Y., Zhong, D., Hao, X., Zhou, T., Bai, Y., Shi, J., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Li, Y., Xiao, J., Pan, H., Zhao, Y., Lu, H., Yin, M., Chen, H., Song, T., & Wei, X.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University (CN)
  • Harbin Medical University (CN)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (CN)
  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (CN)
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
  • Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
  • Jinan Central Hospital (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • First Hospital of Jilin University (CN)
  • Yan'an Hospital Affiliated To Kunming Medical University (CN)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shi, Yuankai
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
677-686
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411477030
Cited by
16
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Transformation Program of Scientific and Technological Achievements of Jiangsu Province (BA2021011)
  • National Science and Technology Major Project (2017ZX09304015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
gefitinib, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, first-line therapy, exon 19 deletion, L858R mutation, progression-free survival, central nervous system metastasis, drug safety, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, China, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review