Cited by 462Head and Neck Cancer StudiesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

Camrelizumab versus placebo in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CAPTAIN-1st): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Yang, Yunpeng, Qu, Song, Li, Jingao, Hu, Chaosu, Xu, Mingjun, Li, Weidong, Zhou, Ting, Shen, Liangfang +27 more·2021·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background The addition of camrelizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin showed promising activity as first-line therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a phase 1 trial. We therefore compared camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin with placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in a randomised phase 3 trial.Methods In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial done at 28 hospitals in China, patients were eligible if they were aged 18-75 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and had previously untreated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; using an interactive web-response system with a block size of four) to receive either camrelizumab (200 mg on day 1) or matching placebo intravenously, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8; cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1) intravenously every 3 weeks for four to six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with camrelizumab or placebo, until radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, start of new anticancer treatment, investigator decision, or withdrawal of consent. Stratification factors used in randomisation were liver metastases, previous radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and ECOG performance status. The allocation sequence was generated by an independent randomisation group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival per independent review committee. The significance threshold for independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival was p=0·0086 (one-sided) at the interim analysis. Efficacy and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03707509, and is closed for enrolment but is ongoing.Findings Between Nov 13, 2018, and Nov 29, 2019, 343 patients were screened and 263 were eligible and were randomly assigned to the camrelizumab group (n=134) or placebo group (n=129). At the prespecified interim analysis (June 15, 2020), independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the camrelizumab group (median 9·7 months [95% CI 8·3-11·4]) than in the placebo group (median 6·9 months [5·9-7·3]; hazard ratio 0·54 [95% CI 0·39-0·76]; one-sided p=0·0002). As of Dec 31, 2020, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events of any cause were decreased white blood cell count (89 [66%] of 134 patients in the camrelizumab group vs 90 [70%] of 129 patients in the placebo group), decreased neutrophil count (86 [64%] vs 85 [66%]), anaemia (53 [40%] vs 57 [44%]), and decreased platelet count (53 [40%] vs 52 [40%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 59 (44%) of 134 patients in the camrelizumab group and 48 (37%) of 129 patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (4%) patients in the camrelizumab group (two unknown cause of death, one multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, one pharyngeal haemorrhage, and one arrhythmia) and one (<1%) patient in the placebo group (unknown cause of death).Interpretation Our findings suggest that camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a new standard of care for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the first-line setting. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm this conclusion.Funding Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals (formerly Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine).Translation For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00302-8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Y., Qu, S., Li, J., Hu, C., Xu, M., Li, W., Zhou, T., Shen, L., Wu, H., Lang, J., Hu, G., Luo, Z., Fu, Z., Qu, S., Feng, W., Chen, X., Lin, S., Zhang, W., Li, X., Sun, Y., Lin, Z., Lin, Q., Lei, F., Long, J., Hong, J., Huang, X., Zeng, L., Wang, P., He, X., Zhang, B., Yang, Q., Zhang, X., Zou, J., Fang, W., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
  • Guangxi Medical University (CN)
  • Nanchang University (CN)
  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN)
  • Gannan Medical University (CN)
  • Guangzhou Medical University Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese People's Liberation Army (CN)
  • First People's Hospital of Foshan (CN)
  • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Fujian Medical University (CN)
  • General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command (CN)
  • Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN)
  • Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (CN)
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Li
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1162-1174
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3177205810
Cited by
462
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 13
FWCI
62.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
camrelizumab, gemcitabine, cisplatin, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, recurrent or metastatic cancer, first-line therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, progression-free survival, maintenance therapy, adverse events, neutropenia, liver metastasis, treatment efficacy and safety, interim analysis, independent review committee
MeSH terms
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Gemcitabine, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cisplatin, Deoxycytidine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review