Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020: a review of current estimates of the national burden, data gaps, and future needs

Bray, Freddie, Parkin, D Maxwell, Gnangnon, Freddy, Tshisimogo, Gontse, Peko, Jean-Felix, Adoubi, Innocent, Assefa, Mathewos, Bojang, Lamin, Awuah, Baffour, Koulibaly, Moussa, Buziba, Nathan, Korir, Anne, Dzamalala, Charles, Kamate, Bakarou, Manraj, Shyam, Ferro, Josefo, Lorenzoni, Cesaltina, Hansen, Rolf, Nouhou, Hassan, Ogunbiyi, Olufemi, Igbinoba, Festus, Ekanem, Ima, Omonisi, Abidemi, Chirpaz, Emmanuel, Uwinkindi, Francois, Finesse, Anne, Somdyala, Ntuthu, Singh, Elvira, Dlamini, Xolisilie, Masalu, Nestory, Serventi, Furaha, Mrema, Caroline, Wabinga, Henry, Ogwang, Martin, Chiwele, Linda, Borok, Margaret, Chingonzoh, Tatenda·2022·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND With the cancer burden rising in sub-Saharan Africa, countries in the region need surveillance systems to measure the magnitude of the problem and monitor progress in cancer control planning. Based on the national estimates built from data provided by cancer registries in sub-Saharan Africa, we summarise key patterns of the regional burden and argue for investments in locally produced data. METHODS To present national estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality burden in sub-Saharan Africa countries, new cancer cases and deaths were extracted from International Agency for Research on Cancers' GLOBOCAN database for the year 2020. Given weak vital statistics systems, almost all of the information on the cancer burden in sub-Saharan Africa was derived from population-based cancer registries. Of the 48 countries included in GLOBOCAN (national populations must be larger than 150 000 inhabitants in 2020), relatively recent cancer registry data (up to 2019) were directly used to produce national incidence estimates in 25 countries, while the absence of such data for 16 meant that estimates were based on data from neighbouring countries. Tables and figures present the estimated numbers of new cases and deaths, as well as age-standardised (incidence or mortality) rates per 100 000 person-years and the cumulative risk of developing or dying from cancer before the age of 75 years. FINDINGS 801 392 new cancer cases and 520 158 cancer deaths were estimated to have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020. Cancers of the breast (129 400 female cases) and cervix (110 300 cases) were responsible for three in ten of the cancers diagnosed in both sexes. Breast and cervical cancer were the most common cancers, ranking first in 28 and 19 countries, respectively. In men, prostate cancer led in terms of incidence (77 300 cases), followed by liver cancer (24 700 cases) and colorectal cancer (23 400 cases). Prostate cancer was the leading incident cancer in men in 40 sub-Saharan Africa countries. The risk of a woman in sub-Saharan Africa developing cancer by the age of 75 years was 14·1%, with breast cancer (4·1%) and cervical cancer (3·5%) responsible for half of this risk. For men, the corresponding cumulative incidence was lower (12·2%), with prostate cancer responsible for a third of this risk (4·2%). Cervical cancer was the leading form of cancer death among women in 27 countries, followed by breast cancer (21 countries). Prostate cancer led as the most common type of cancer death in 26 countries, with liver cancer ranking second (11 countries). INTERPRETATION The estimates indicate substantial geographical variations in the major cancers in sub-Saharan Africa. Rational cancer control planning requires capacity to be built for data production, analysis, and interpretation within the countries themselves. Cancer registries provide important information in this respect and should be prioritised for sustainable investment in the region. FUNDING None.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00270-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Metadata

Authors
Bray, F., Parkin, D. M., Gnangnon, F., Tshisimogo, G., Peko, J.-F., Adoubi, I., Assefa, M., Bojang, L., Awuah, B., Koulibaly, M., Buziba, N., Korir, A., Dzamalala, C., Kamate, B., Manraj, S., Ferro, J., Lorenzoni, C., Hansen, R., Nouhou, H., Ogunbiyi, O., Igbinoba, F., Ekanem, I., Omonisi, A., Chirpaz, E., Uwinkindi, F., Finesse, A., Somdyala, N., Singh, E., Dlamini, X., Masalu, N., Serventi, F., Mrema, C., Wabinga, H., Ogwang, M., Chiwele, L., Borok, M., & Chingonzoh, T.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
719-728
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229446553
Cited by
282
References
31
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020: a review of current estimates of the national burden, data gaps, and future needs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00270-4
The paper
Bray, F., Parkin, D. M., Gnangnon, F., Tshisimogo, G., Peko, J.-F., Adoubi, I., Assefa, M., Bojang, L., Awuah, B., Koulibaly, M., Buziba, N., Korir, A., Dzamalala, C., Kamate, B., Manraj, S., Ferro, J., Lorenzoni, C., Hansen, R., Nouhou, H., . . . Chingonzoh, T. (2022). Cancer in sub-Saharan Africa in 2020: a review of current estimates of the national burden, data gaps, and future needs. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00270-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.