Cited by 7,553Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionScience, Research, and Medicine

Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods

Open access
Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Mathers, C., Parkin, D.M., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., Bray, F.·2019·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Estimates of the worldwide incidence and mortality from 36 cancers and for all cancers combined for the year 2018 are now available in the GLOBOCAN 2018 database, compiled and disseminated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This paper reviews the sources and methods used in compiling the cancer statistics in 185 countries. The validity of the national estimates depends upon the representativeness of the source information, and to take into account possible sources of bias, uncertainty intervals are now provided for the estimated sex‐ and site‐specific all‐ages number of new cancer cases and cancer deaths. We briefly describe the key results globally and by world region. There were an estimated 18.1 million (95% UI: 17.5–18.7 million) new cases of cancer (17 million excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million (95% UI: 9.3–9.8 million) deaths from cancer (9.5 million excluding non‐melanoma skin cancer) worldwide in 2018.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.31937

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Country-specific cervical cancer incidence data are based on GLOBOCAN estimates, which, where possible, are derived from extrapolation of recent trends in incidence obtained from national or subnational population-based cancer registries.

    “Finally, our country-specific cervical cancer incidence data are based on GLOBOCAN estimates,42, 53 which, where possible, are derived from extrapolation of recent trends in incidence obtained from national or subnational population-based cancer registries.”

    From Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

    The ‘Estimates of cancer incidence by country’ section says GLOBOCAN predicted 2018 rates from recent national incidence data for 45 countries. It also used subnational registry data, but describes using recent rates as proxies or modelling incidence from mortality—not extrapolating recent subnational incidence trends. The source therefore supports the general description but not that specific account of the subnational method. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dyba T, Hakulinen T. Comparison of different approaches to incidence prediction based on sim- ple interpolation techniques. Stat Med 2000;19: 1741-52. 1952 GLOBOCAN 2018 sources and methods Int. J. Cancer: 144, 1941-1953 (2019) © 2018 UICC Cancer Epidemiology 10970215, 2019, 8, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.31937 by Readcube (Labtiva Inc.), Wiley Online Library on [14/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Mathers, C., Parkin, D. M., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., & Bray, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferlay, J.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
144
Issue
8
Pages
1941-1953
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2895926103
Cited by
7,553
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 251 · 2025: 513 · 2024: 812 · 2023: 978 · 2022: 1340 · 2021: 1805 · 2020: 1403 · 2019: 425 · 2018: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
344.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Leicester
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
Keywords
cancer incidence, cancer mortality, non-melanoma skin cancer, uncertainty intervals, source bias, world regions
MeSH terms
Global Burden of Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Incidence, Survival Rate, Databases, Factual, Sex Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review