The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab is a standard-of-care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. METHODS In this randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091), patients were recruited from 196 medical centres in 29 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage IB (tumours of ≥4 cm in diameter), II, or IIIA NSCLC per the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) of any histology or PD-L1 expression level, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; adjuvant chemotherapy was to be considered for stage IB disease and was strongly recommended for stage II and IIIA disease, according to national and local guidelines. Using a central interactive voice-response system, eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation technique and stratified by disease stage, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, PD-L1 expression, and geographical region, to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 18 cycles. Participants, investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. Dual primary endpoints were disease-free survival in the overall population and in the population with PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group). Safety was assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here we report results of the second interim analysis, prespecified to occur when approximately 118 disease-free survival events had occurred in the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02504372, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS Between Jan 20, 2016, and May 6, 2020, 1177 (60%) of 1955 screened participants were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=590, including n=168 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) or placebo (n=587; including n=165 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) and included in the ITT population. Median follow-up as of data cutoff (Sept 20, 2021) for this interim analysis was 35·6 months (IQR 27·1-45·5). In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 53·6 months (95% CI 39·2 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group versus 42·0 months (31·3 to not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·63-0·91], p=0·0014). In the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population, median disease-free survival was not reached in either the pembrolizumab group (95% CI 44·3 to not reached) or the placebo group (95% CI 35·8 to not reached; HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·57-1·18]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 198 (34%) of 580 participants who received pembrolizumab and 150 (26%) of 581 participants who received placebo. Grade 3 or worse events that occurred in at least ten participants in either treatment group were hypertension (35 [6%]) and pneumonia (12 [2%]) with pembrolizumab and hypertension (32 [6%]) with placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 142 (24%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 90 (15%) in the placebo group; serious adverse events that occurred in more than 1% of participants were pneumonia (13 [2%]), pneumonitis (12 [2%]), and diarrhoea (seven [1%]) with pembrolizumab and pneumonia (nine [2%]) with placebo. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants treated with pembrolizumab (one due to both cardiogenic shock and myocarditis, one due to both septic shock and myocarditis, one due to pneumonia, and one due to sudden death) and in no participants treated with placebo. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab significantly improved disease-free survival compared with placebo and was not associated with new safety signals in completely resected, PD-L1-unselected, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Pembrolizumab is potentially a new treatment option for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC after complete resection and, when recommended, adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Reck, M., Rodríguez-Abreu, D., Robinson, A. G., Hui, R., Csőszi, T., Fülöp, A., Gottfried, M., Peled, N., Tafreshi, A., Cuffe, S., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1606774 · Cited by 10,089
Self-citationHerbst, R. S., Baas, P., Kim, D.-W., Felip, E., Pérez-Gracia, J. L., Han, J.-Y., Molina, J., Kim, J.-H., Arvis, C. D., Ahn, M.-J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01281-7 · Cited by 6,449
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
Mok, T. S. K., Wu, Y.-L., Kudaba, I., Kowalski, D. M., Cho, B. C., Turna, H. Z., Castro, G., Srimuninnimit, V., Laktionov, K. K., Bondarenko, I., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32409-7 · Cited by 3,303
Self-citationPocock, S. J., & Simon, R. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529712 · Cited by 2,350
Postmus, P. E., Kerr, K. M., Oudkerk, M., Senan, S., Waller, D. A., Vansteenkiste, J., Escriu, C., & Peters, S. (2017) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx222 · Cited by 2,302
Self-citationAdjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma
Weber, J., Mandala, M., Del Vecchio, M., Gogas, H. J., Arance, A. M., Cowey, C. L., Dalle, S., Schenker, M., Chiarion-Sileni, V., Marquez-Rodas, I., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1709030 · Cited by 2,246
Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma
Eggermont, A. M. M., Blank, C. U., Mandala, M., Long, G. V., Atkinson, V., Dalle, S., Haydon, A., Lichinitser, M., Khattak, A., Carlino, M. S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1802357 · Cited by 1,906
Self-citationAdjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer
Kelly, R. J., Ajani, J. A., Kuzdzal, J., Zander, T., Van Cutsem, E., Piessen, G., Mendez, G., Feliciano, J., Motoyama, S., Lièvre, A., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2032125 · Cited by 1,827
Cited by
Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Wakelee, H., Liberman, M., Kato, T., Tsuboi, M., Lee, S.-H., Gao, S., Chen, K.-N., Dooms, C., Majem, M., Eigendorff, E., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2302983 · Cited by 1,180
Self-citationAdvances in molecular pathology and therapy of non-small cell lung cancer
Huang, Q., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Wu, J., Bao, W., Xue, C., Li, X., Dong, S., Dong, Z., & Hu, S. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02243-6 · Cited by 197
Advances and future directions in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer
Boulanger, M. C., Schneider, J. L., & Lin, J. J. (2024) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyae205 · Cited by 38
Aguiar-Ibáñez, R., Mbous, Y. P. V., Sharma, S., & Chawla, E. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1546447 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Brien, M., Paz-Ares, L., Marreaud, S., Dafni, U., Oselin, K., Havel, L., Esteban, E., Isla, D., Martinez-Marti, A., Faehling, M., Tsuboi, M., Lee, J.-S., Nakagawa, K., Yang, J., Samkari, A., Keller, S. M., Mauer, M., Jha, N., Stahel, R., Besse, B., & Peters, S.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1274-1286
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4296036096
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 92.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00518-6
- The paper
- O’Brien, M., Paz-Ares, L., Marreaud, S., Dafni, U., Oselin, K., Havel, L., Esteban, E., Isla, D., Martinez-Marti, A., Faehling, M., Tsuboi, M., Lee, J.-S., Nakagawa, K., Yang, J., Samkari, A., Keller, S. M., Mauer, M., Jha, N., Stahel, R., . . . Peters, S. (2022). Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00518-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.