The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Raltegravir once daily or twice daily in previously untreated patients with HIV-1: a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Twice-daily raltegravir with once-daily tenofovir-emtricitabine is an effective initial antiretroviral regimen for patients with HIV-1. On the basis of pharmacokinetic data suggesting efficacy of once-daily raltegravir and because adherence is often improved with once-daily dosing, we aimed to compare these dosing schedules. METHODS In our international, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority study, we enrolled antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV RNA loads of more than 5000 copies per mL and no baseline resistance to tenofovir or emtricitabine at 83 centres worldwide. We randomly allocated patients (1:1) by use of a computer-generated sequence to receive raltegravir once daily (two 400 mg tablets taken together every 24 h), or twice daily (one 400 mg tablet every 12 h), both in combination with once-daily co-formulated tenofovir 300 mg plus emtricitabine 150 mg. The primary outcome was virological response at 48 weeks (viral RNA loads <50 copies per mL) in patients who received at least one dose of study drug, counting non-completers as failure. We assessed non-inferiority in terms of the proportion of patients in both treatment groups who achieved the primary outcome, with a non-inferiority margin of -10%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00745823. FINDINGS From Oct 15, 2008, to Nov 2, 2009, we randomly allocated 775 patients, of whom 382 (99%) of 386 patients in the once-daily group and 388 (99%) of 389 in the twice-daily group received at least one dose of study drug. At baseline, 304 (39%) of 770 treated patients had viral loads of more than 100,000 copies per mL and 188 (24%) had CD4 cell counts of fewer than 200 cells per μL. 318 (83%) of 382 patients in the once-daily group had virological response compared with 343 (89%) of 386 in the twice-daily group (difference -5·7%, 95% CI -10·7 to -0·83; p=0·044). Serious adverse events were reported in 26 (7%) of 382 once-daily recipients and 40 (10%) of 388 twice-daily recipients, and adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in four (1%) patients in each group. INTERPRETATION Despite high response rates with both regimens, once-daily raltegravir cannot be recommended in place of twice-daily dosing. FUNDING Merck.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inhibitors of Strand Transfer That Prevent Integration and Inhibit HIV-1 Replication in Cells
Hazuda, D. J., Felock, P., Witmer, M., Wolfe, A., Stillmock, K., Grobler, J. A., Espeseth, A., Gabryelski, L., Schleif, W., Blau, C., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5453.646 · Cited by 1,131
Self-citationEspeseth, A. S., Felock, P., Wolfe, A., Witmer, M., Grobler, J., Anthony, N., Egbertson, M., Melamed, J. Y., Young, S., Hamill, T., et al. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.200139397 · Cited by 317
Self-citation
Cited by
Raffi, F., Jaeger, H., Quiros-Roldan, E., Albrecht, H., Belonosova, E., Gatell, J. M., Baril, J.-G., Domingo, P., Brennan, C., Almond, S., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70257-3 · Cited by 379
Nachega, J. B., Parienti, J.-J., Uthman, O. A., Gross, R., Dowdy, D. W., Sax, P. E., Gallant, J. E., Mugavero, M. J., Mills, E. J., & Giordano, T. P. (2014) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciu046 · Cited by 357
Efficacies of Cabotegravir and Bictegravir against drug-resistant HIV-1 integrase mutants
Smith, S. J., Zhao, X. Z., Burke, T. R., & Hughes, S. H. (2018) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/s12977-018-0420-7 · Cited by 114
Hernandez, A. V., Pasupuleti, V., Deshpande, A., Thota, P., Collins, J. A., & Vidal, J. E. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063272 · Cited by 29
Yang, G., Si-Tayeb, K., Corbineau, S., Vernet, R., Gayon, R., Dianat, N., Martinet, C., Clay, D., Goulinet-Mainot, S., Tachdjian, G., et al. (2013) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-11-86 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Eron, J. J., Rockstroh, J. K., Reynes, J., Andrade-Villanueva, J., Ramalho-Madruga, J. V., Bekker, L.-G., Young, B., Katlama, C., Gatell-Artigas, J. M., Arribas, J. R., Nelson, M., Campbell, H., Zhao, J., Rodgers, A. J., Rizk, M. L., Wenning, L., Miller, M. D., Hazuda, D., DiNubile, M. J., Leavitt, R., Isaacs, R., Robertson, M. N., Sklar, P., & Nguyen, B.-Y.
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 907-915
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075531822
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Raltegravir once daily or twice daily in previously untreated patients with HIV-1: a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70196-7
- The paper
- Eron, J. J., Rockstroh, J. K., Reynes, J., Andrade-Villanueva, J., Ramalho-Madruga, J. V., Bekker, L.-G., Young, B., Katlama, C., Gatell-Artigas, J. M., Arribas, J. R., Nelson, M., Campbell, H., Zhao, J., Rodgers, A. J., Rizk, M. L., Wenning, L., Miller, M. D., Hazuda, D., DiNubile, M. J., . . . Nguyen, B.-Y. (2011). Raltegravir once daily or twice daily in previously untreated patients with HIV-1: a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70196-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.