Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 987

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium

Open access
Checkley, William, White, A Clinton, Jaganath, Devan, Arrowood, Michael J, Chalmers, Rachel M, Chen, Xian-Ming, Fayer, Ronald, Griffiths, Jeffrey K, Guerrant, Richard L, Hedstrom, Lizbeth, Huston, Christopher D, Kotloff, Karen L, Kang, Gagandeep, Mead, Jan R, Miller, Mark, Petri, William A, Priest, Jeffrey W, Roos, David S, Striepen, Boris, Thompson, R C Andrew, Ward, Honorine D, Van Voorhis, Wesley A, Xiao, Lihua, Zhu, Guan, Houpt, Eric R·2015·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Cryptosporidium spp are well recognised as causes of diarrhoeal disease during waterborne epidemics and in immunocompromised hosts. Studies have also drawn attention to an underestimated global burden and suggest major gaps in optimum diagnosis, treatment, and immunisation. Cryptosporidiosis is increasingly identified as an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Studies in low-resource settings and high-income countries have confirmed the importance of cryptosporidium as a cause of diarrhoea and childhood malnutrition. Diagnostic tests for cryptosporidium infection are suboptimum, necessitating specialised tests that are often insensitive. Antigen-detection and PCR improve sensitivity, and multiplexed antigen detection and molecular assays are underused. Therapy has some effect in healthy hosts and no proven efficacy in patients with AIDS. Use of cryptosporidium genomes has helped to identify promising therapeutic targets, and drugs are in development, but methods to assess the efficacy in vitro and in animals are not well standardised. Partial immunity after exposure suggests the potential for successful vaccines, and several are in development; however, surrogates of protection are not well defined. Improved methods for propagation and genetic manipulation of the organism would be significant advances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70772-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 987

Metadata

Authors
Checkley, W., White, A. C., Jaganath, D., Arrowood, M. J., Chalmers, R. M., Chen, X.-M., Fayer, R., Griffiths, J. K., Guerrant, R. L., Hedstrom, L., Huston, C. D., Kotloff, K. L., Kang, G., Mead, J. R., Miller, M., Petri, W. A., Priest, J. W., Roos, D. S., Striepen, B., Thompson, R. C. A., Ward, H. D., Van Voorhis, W. A., Xiao, L., Zhu, G., & Houpt, E. R.
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
85-94
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139993911
Cited by
987
References
1
FWCI
42.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70772-8
The paper
Checkley, W., White, A. C., Jaganath, D., Arrowood, M. J., Chalmers, R. M., Chen, X.-M., Fayer, R., Griffiths, J. K., Guerrant, R. L., Hedstrom, L., Huston, C. D., Kotloff, K. L., Kang, G., Mead, J. R., Miller, M., Petri, W. A., Priest, J. W., Roos, D. S., Striepen, B., . . . Houpt, E. R. (2015). A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(14)70772-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.